期刊文献+

历史性权利在《联合国海洋法公约》中的地位 被引量:15

On Status of Historic Right in the UNCLOS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 历史性权利是历史性水域的理论依据,《联合国海洋法公约》对历史性权利的地位并没有明确规定,但从条约解释规则及时际法理论分析,《联合国海洋法公约》并没有否认历史性权利的存在。唯有通过利益相关国的不断努力才能使《联合国海洋法公约》明确规定历史性权利在公约中的地位。 Abstract: Historic right is the basis of historic waters. Though the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) does not specify the status of historic right,the UNCLOS does not deny the existence of historic right from the point of general rule of interpretation on treaty and theory of intertemporal law. Only by striving of interested states, can the status of historic right be specified by UNCLOS.
作者 曲波
出处 《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期31-34,共4页 Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金项目(11CFX065) 辽宁省社科基金项目(L10CFX009)
关键词 历史性权利 《联合国海洋法公约》 条约解释规则 时际法 Historic Right UNCLOS Rule of Interpretation on Treaty Intertemporal Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献17

  • 1赵理海.从国际法看我国对南海诸岛无可争辩的主权[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1992,29(3):32-42. 被引量:32
  • 2G. Smith, "Sovereignty in the North: the Canadian Aspect of an International Problem (A), in R. Macdonald ed. , The Arctic Frontier, Toronto: Toronto University, 1966. 244.
  • 3Act to Amend the Territorial Sea and Fishing Zones Act (Z), c. 68, 1969-70 S.C. 1243, 1970, Canada.
  • 4Donat Pharand, Canada's Arctic Waters in International Law (M), Cambridge: University Press, 1988. 9.
  • 5Donat Pharand, "The Arctic Waters and the North west Passage: A Final Revisit," [J]. Ocean Devel opment & International Law, Vol 38, No. 1, Janu ary 2007. 13.
  • 61951 International Court of Jury, Report 133 (Z), http://iilj, org/courses/documents/UnitedKingdomv. Norway_ICJ1951 . pdf.
  • 7AMSA, Protection of the Arctic Maritime Environment [Z]. Arctic Council, 2009 Report. 20.
  • 8Ronald Purver, "Aspects of Sovereignty and Security in the Arctic," (A) in Donald McRae and Gordon Munro, eds. , Canadian Oceans Policy: National Strategies and the New Law of the Sea, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1989. 175.
  • 9Donald R. Rothwell, "The Canadian- U. S. Northwest Passage Dispute.. A Reassessment," [J]. Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1993. 360.
  • 10.中国外交部文件《中国对西沙群岛和南沙群岛的主权无可争辩》.《人民日报》,1980年1月30日.

共引文献54

同被引文献213

引证文献15

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部