期刊文献+

温哥华与成都管理模式比较研究 被引量:2

A Comparative Study on Management Mode between Vancouver and Chengdu
下载PDF
导出
摘要 21世纪以来,被称为当今世界最适宜人居城市之一的温哥华和被评为未来十年全球最具竞争力城市之一的成都取得了巨大的发展成就,究其原因,二者均着力于创新城市管理,除在管理体制、组织结构等方面各具地域特色外,且分别在探索适合自身发展的城市管理道路过程中,形成了特色鲜明的治理模式。通过对两个城市的管理比较研究表明,城市管理模式在以温哥华为代表的公民参与协调模式和以成都为代表的城乡统筹模式两者之间,绝不是简单的折衷,而是科学化管理必然走向人性化管理的演变途径,可以为探索世界现代化城市发展路径提供有益的借鉴。 Since the 21st century, great achievements have been made by Vancouver and Chengdu; the former is one of the most livable cities worldwide, and the latter is among the world' s most competitive cities in the next decade. Both cities focus on innovation in urban management; each has its unique management modes and organization structure. Both cities have formed their distinct features of management in the process of exploring proper ways for urban development. A comparative study on Vancouver and Chengdu reveals two urban management modes, namely, the mode of Citizen Participation and Coordination (Vancouver) and the mode of Coordinating Urban - Rural Development (Chengdu). The paper concludes that forming a proper mode of urban management is not simply to make a compromise, but it is an inevitable process of changing from scientific management to humanistic management, which may cast light on our effort to explore appropriate modes of development for modem cities.
作者 郭雪飞
出处 《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期144-149,共6页 Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
关键词 大温哥华地区 成都 城市管理 公民参与 城乡统筹 GVRD, Chengdu, urban management, citizen participation, coordinating urban-rural development
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1H.Peter Oberlander,Patrick J.Smith. Governing Metropolitan Vancouver:Regional Intergovernmental Relations in British Columbia[A].University ofCalifornia; Institute of Intergovernmental Relations,Queen' s University,1993.329-373.
  • 2H.Peter Oberlander,Patrick J.Smith. Province of British Columbia.A Municipal Act Reform,Regional District Legislation:A Discussion Paper[A].1999.
  • 3GVRD. Creating our Future:Steps towards a More Livable Region[M].Vancouver,Canada,1990.
  • 4GVRD. Creating Our Future:Steps to a More Livable Region[M].Burnaby,BC VRD,1996.5.
  • 5GVRD. Greater Vancouver Regional District Submission for the Dubai Award for Best Practices[M].2002.12.
  • 6GVRD. 2002 Annual Report:Livable Region Strategic Plan[M].Vancouver,Canada:Greater Vancouver Regional District,2002.11.
  • 7Lennard,S.H,H.L.Lennard. Livable Cities Observed:A Source Book of Images and Ideas for City Officials,Community leaders,Architects,Planners and All Others Committed to Making their Cities Livable[M].Califomia,USA:Gondolier Press,1995.6.
  • 8孙平.成都城市发展报告2005-2006:城乡一体的城市化道路[M]成都:四川科学技术出版社,200780.
  • 9阎星.成都市统筹城乡促进经济发展方式转变研究[M]成都:四川科学技术出版社,200845-46.
  • 10胡滨,薛晖,曾九利,何旻.成都城乡统筹规划编制的理念、实践及经验启示[J].规划师,2009,25(8):26-30. 被引量:30

二级参考文献5

共引文献34

同被引文献14

  • 1罗震东.大温哥华区战略规划的实施与监督[J].国际城市规划,2007,22(5):86-90. 被引量:11
  • 2Peterson, P. City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.
  • 3Stone C N. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1989.
  • 4Logan, John R., and Harvey L. Molotch. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Ber- keley: University of California Press, 1987.
  • 5Scharpf F W. Games real actors play: Actor- centered institutionalism in policy research. Boul- der, CO: Westview Press, 1997.
  • 6Stone C N. Urban Regimes and the Capacity to Govern: A political Economy Approach. Journal of urban affairs, 1995,15(1): 1-28.
  • 7Mason M. Collaborative partnehips for urban development: a study of the Vancouver Agree- ment. Environment and Planning A, 2007, 39(10): 2366-2382.
  • 8Rotberg H. Exploring Vancouverism: The po- litical culture of Canada's lotus land[M]. Canadi- an Values Press, 2008.
  • 9温哥华协议官方网站http://www.vancouveragreement.ca/how-it-works/.
  • 10梁志峰.长株潭城市群“两型社会”建设中基础设施共建共享之湘潭对策研究[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2009,12(2):115-123. 被引量:10

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部