摘要
目的:比较解剖钢板和Liss钢板对胫骨平台粉碎性骨折的疗效。方法:75例胫骨平台骨折患者分为2组,治疗组(38例)行解剖钢板固定,对照组(37例)行Liss钢板固定,比较两组疗效。结果:两组患者手术时间、术后负重时间、平均住院时间、骨折愈合时间等比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),平均住院费用比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗组治疗有效率与对照组比较差异无统计学意义。结论:解剖钢板与Liss钢板对胫骨平台骨折患者疗效相当,但解剖钢板治疗费用较少、技术要求不高,更容易在基层医院临床推广使用。
Objective：To analysis the therapeutic effect of anatomical nickelclads and Liss nickelclads fixed in the tibial plateau comminuted fractures.Methods：75 patients with tibial plateau fracture were randomly divided into the experimental group（38 cases） and the control group（37 cases）.The anatomical nickelclads and Liss nickelclads were used respectively in the two groups,and the effectiveness was discussed.Results：There were no significant difference in the operation time,weight-bearing time after operation,average stay and healing timebetween the two groups（P〉0.05）;there were no significant difference in the excellent and good rate between the two groups（χ2=0.19,P〉0.05）;and there were significant difference in the cost of hospitalization between the two groups.Conclusion：The effectiveness of anatomical and Liss nickelclads is similar in treating tibial plateau comminuted fractures,but the anatomical nickelclads is cheaper and simpler than the Liss nickelclads,and more suitable for the primary hospitals.
出处
《中国中医骨伤科杂志》
CAS
2012年第7期44-45,共2页
Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics
关键词
解剖钢板
LISS钢板
胫骨平台骨折
Anatomical nickelclad
Liss nickelclad
Tibial plateau fractures
