期刊文献+

ENBD和ERBD对胆总管结石ERCP后并发症预防作用 被引量:11

EFFCACY OF ENBD AND ERBD IN THE PREVENTION OF POST-ERCP COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH COMMON DUCT STONES
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较两种引流方法对胆管结石逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后并发症的预防作用。方法将263例接受ERCP治疗的胆管结石病人随机分成3组,A组88例采用经内镜鼻胆管引流术(ENBD)治疗,B组86例采用经内镜胆管内引流术(ERBD)治疗,C组89例采用常规药物治疗。记录3组病人ERCP后胰腺炎、高淀粉酶血症及胆管感染发生率并进行比较。结果 A组ERCP后胰腺炎发生率为1.1%,B组为1.2%,C组为11.2%;A组高淀粉酶血症发生率为8.0%,B组为9.3%,C组为22.5%;A组胆管感染发生率为1.1%,B组为1.2%,C组为9.0%。A、B组以上3种并发症发生率与C组比较差异有显著性(χ2=5.491~7.744,P<0.05)。3组均无穿孔、出血、死亡等并发症。结论 ENBD或ERBD可减少胆管结石ERCP后并发症的发生率,且作用相近。 Objective To compare the effectiveness of ENBD and ERBD in the prevention of post ERCP complications in patients with common bile duct stones. Methods This study consisted of 263 patients with common duct stones, who were randomized to groups A (ENBD group,n:88), group B (ERBD group,n=86), and group C (routine drug treatment group,n:89). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, hyperamylasemia and biiiary tract infection was recorded and compared among the three groups. Results The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in groups A, B and C was 1. 1%, 1.2% and 11. 2%, that of hy peramylasemia was 8.0%, 9.3%and 22.5% ; and that of biliary tract infection was 1. 1%, 1.2%and 9.0%, respectively. The differences of above-mentioned three complications between groups A/B and C was significant (χ2 =5. 491 7. 744,P〈0.05). No perforation, hemorrhage or death was noted in the three groups. Conclusion ENBD and ERBD show similar effect on reducing the occurrence of post-ERCP complications in patients with common bile duct stones.
出处 《青岛大学医学院学报》 CAS 2012年第3期264-265,268,共3页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Qingdao Universitatis
关键词 引流术 胆总管结石 并发症 drainage choledocholithiasis complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1COTTON P B, LEHMAN G, VENNES J,et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their man- agement: an attempt at consensus[-J. Gastrointest Endosc, 1991,37(3) :383-393.
  • 2杨洪芝,代素美,仇夏,赵显芝.ERCP及EST术后急性胰腺炎的观察与护理[J].齐鲁医学杂志,2003,18(3):339-340. 被引量:1
  • 3FREEMAN M L. Adverse outcomes of ERCP[-J. Gastroin- test Endosc, 2002,56 (Suppl) : $273-$282.
  • 4CHRISTOFORIDIS E, GOULIMARIS I, KANELLOS I, et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: patient-re- lated and operative risk factors[-J. Endoscopy, 2002,34 (4): 286-292.
  • 5FREEMAN M L, DISARIO J A, NELSON D B, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis a prospective multicenter study[-J. Gastrointest Endosc, 2001,54(4) :425-434.
  • 6MASCI E, MARIANI A, CURIONI S, et al. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopanere- atography a meta-analysis E Jl. Endoscopy, 2003,35 (10) 830-834.
  • 7RABENSTEIN T, HAHN E G. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: is the endoscopist's experience the major risk factor EJ. JOP, 2002,3 (6) .. 177-187.
  • 8施新岗.ERCP术后并发症的危险因素[J].胰腺病学,2003,3(2):68-68. 被引量:6
  • 9宋丽亚,赵清喜,孔心涓,田字彬,张琪.ENBD预防胆管多发结石ERCP术后急性胰腺炎及高淀粉酶血症65例[J].世界华人消化杂志,2010,18(16):1724-1727. 被引量:58
  • 10李兆申,许国铭,孙振兴,邹晓平,金震东,邹多武.诊断性与治疗性ERCP早期并发症与处理[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2002,19(2):77-80. 被引量:205

二级参考文献49

  • 1FENG Tao CHEN Liangshi KE Wei Corrosion Science Laboratory,Institute of Corrosion and Protection of Metals,Academia Sinica,Shenyang,China.EFFECT OF POTENTIAL ON INTERACTION BETWEEN STRESS CORROSION CRACKING AND CORROSION FATIGUE OF AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL IN BOILING 42% MgCl_2 SOLUTION[J].Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English Letters),1991,4(9):168-173. 被引量:4
  • 2李兆申.ERCP临床应用进展[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2004,21(4):223-224. 被引量:38
  • 3黄永德,宛新建,孙振兴.ENBD预防治疗性ERCP术后高淀粉酶血症及胰腺炎[J].临床军医杂志,2007,35(3):346-348. 被引量:16
  • 4Cotton PB,Lehman G,Vennes J,Geenen JE,ussell RC,Meyers WC,Liguory C,Nickl N.Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management:an attempt at consensus.Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383-393.
  • 5Loperfido S,Angelini G,Benedetti G,Chilovi F,Costan F,De Berardinis F,De Bernardin M,Ederle A,Fina P,Fratton A.Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP:a prospective multicenter study.Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:1-10.
  • 6Tanner AR.ERCP:present practice in a single region.Suggested standards for monitoring performance.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996;8:145-148.
  • 7Christensen M,Matzen P,Schulze S,Rosenberg J.Complications of ERCP:a prospective study.Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:721-731.
  • 8Christoforidis E,Goulimaris I,Kanellos I,Tsalis K,Demetriades C,Betsis D.Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia:patient-related and operative risk factors.Endoscopy 2002;34:286-292.
  • 9Cheng CL,Sherman S,Watkins JL,Barnett J,Freeman M,Geenen J,Ryan M,Parker H,Frakes JT,Fogel EL,Silverman WB,Dua KS,Aliperti G,Yakshe P,Uzer M,Jones W,Goff J,Lazzell-Pannell L,Rashdan A,Temkit M,Lehman GA.Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis:a prospective multicenter study.Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:139-147.
  • 10Masci E,Mariani A,Curioni S,Testoni PA.Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography:a metaanalysis.Endoscopy 2003;35:830-834.

共引文献278

同被引文献95

引证文献11

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部