期刊文献+

经皮长U形空心椎弓根钉系统治疗胸腰椎骨折的生物力学研究 被引量:9

Biomechanical evaluation of the long U-shaped hollow pedicle screw system for percutaneous fixation of thoracolumbar fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价经皮长U形空心椎弓根钉系统内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的生物力学性能。方法采集成年新鲜胸腰椎标本8具,平均分为普通椎弓根钉组和长U形空心椎弓根钉组,每组4具标本。制作椎体前厢压缩性骨折,分刖采用普通椎弓根钉和长U形空心椎弓根钉固定治疗,利用生物力学的电测试验应力分析方法测试固定后脊往的极限压缩强度、轴向压缩刚度、弯曲刚度、扭矩和扭转刚度=结果普通椎弓根钉组和长U形空心椎弓根钉组的平均极限压缩强度分别为(3450.02±110.03)、(3430.04±102.12)MPa,平均轴向压缩刚度分别为(407.52±33.02)、(395.04±26.46)N/mm,平均弯曲刚度分别为(305.14±26.53)、(295.12±23.80)N·cm/Deg,平均扭矩分别为(6.45±0.25)、(6。25±0.21)N·m,平均扭转刚度分别为(0.54±0.04)、(0.52±0.03)N·cm/Deg,以上项目两组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论长U形空心椎弓根钉系统内固定胸腰椎骨折术后的生物力学性能与普通椎弓根螺钉接近,能满足骨折愈合的生物力学要求。 Objective To evaluate the biomechanieal characteristics of the long U-shaped hollow pedicle screw system for percutaneous fixation of thuracolumbar fi'actures. Methods Models of vertebral cmnpression fracture were created bv flexion in 8 fresh cadaveric samples of thoracolumhar spine. The models were divided into 2 equal groups according to the fixation system applied. In group A conventional pediele screws were used while in group B hmg U-shaped hollow pedicle screws were used. The yield cmupressive strength, axial eompression stiffiless, bending stiffness, torque and torsional stiffness of all the fixated spines in the 2 groups were tested by the bio-meehanical electrical measurement and compared as well. Results The conventional pediele screws and long U-shaped hollow pedicle screws showed no significant differences re- garding yield compressive strength (3450.02 ± 110.03 MPa vs. 3430.04±102. 12 MPa), axial compressinn stiffness(407.52±33.02 N/ram vs. 395.04± 26.46 N/mm), bending stiffness (305. 14 ± 26. 53 N · cm/Deg vs. 295. 12±23.80N ·cm/Deg), torqne (6.45±0.25 N · m vs. 6.25±0.21 N · m) or torsional stiffness (0.54 ±0.04 N · cm/Deg vs. 0. 52 ±0, 03 N · em/Deg) ( P 〉 0.05). Conclusion The hmg U-shaped hollow pedicle screw system can satisfy the biomechanical requirements for fixation of thoracolumbar fractures and can fimctiml as well as the conventional pedicle screw system.
作者 王春 陈少坚
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期595-598,共4页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
基金 福建省医学创新课题(2007-CXB-18)
关键词 胸椎 腰椎 骨折 骨钉 生物力学 Thoracic vertebra Lumbar vertebra Fractures, bone Bone nails Biome- chanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Daniels AH,Arthur M,Hart RA. Variability in rates of anhrodesis for patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures with and without associated neurologic iniury[J].Spine,2007.2334-2338.doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815574c5.
  • 2Kim DY,Lee SH,Chung SK. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength:percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation[J].Spine,2005.123-129.
  • 3王春,林永绥,刘清平,刘成招,吴李勇,王越.经皮长尾可折U形空心椎弓根钉系统固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效评估[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2012,22(7):627-633. 被引量:27
  • 4王以进;王介麟.骨科生物力学[M]北京:人民军医出版社,1989.
  • 5Nathan H. Compression of the sympathetic trunk by osteophytes of the vertebral column in the abdomen:an anatomical study with pathological and clinical considerations[J].Surgery,1968.609-625.
  • 6李驰,徐华梓,王向阳,倪文飞,池永龙,黄其衫,林焱,毛方敏.经皮与开放椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折对椎旁肌影响的比较[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(14):972-975. 被引量:18
  • 7镇万新,高国勇,王巨,刘洪涛,徐亮.微创经皮椎弓根内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2007,9(7):638-641. 被引量:15
  • 8Prokop A,L(o)hlein F,Chmielnicki M. Minimally invasive percutaneous instnmentation for spine fractures[J].Unfallchirurg,2009.621-624,626-628.
  • 9Denis F,Armstrong GW,Searls K. Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficit.A comparison between operative and noonperative treatment[J].Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,1984,(189):142-149.
  • 10Foley KT,Gupta SK. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine:preliminary clinical results[J].Journal of Neurosurgery,2002,(1Suppl):7-12.

二级参考文献35

  • 1池永龙,徐华梓,林焱,黄其杉,毛方敏,倪文飞.微创经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的初步探讨[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(21):1307-1311. 被引量:125
  • 2王华东,侯树勋,史亚民,李利.椎弓根固定结合椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(6):533-536. 被引量:23
  • 3陈亮清,白龙,蔡祖祥,陈敏,陈科明.X线引导下经皮通用脊柱系统内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(10):864-865. 被引量:6
  • 4黄其杉,彭茂秀,林焱,毛方敏,倪文飞,王向阳,池永龙,徐华梓.经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(12):758-760. 被引量:49
  • 5Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, et al. Comparison of muhifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine, 2005, 30( 1 ) : 123 - 129.
  • 6Huang TJ, Hsu RW, Li YY, et al. Less systemic cytokine response in patients following microendoscopic versus open lumbar discectomy. J Orthop Res, 2005, 23(2) : 406 -411.
  • 7Farey JP, Weidenbaum M, Glassman S. Sagittal index in the management of thoracolumbar burst ftactures. Spine, 1990, 15 (9) : 958 - 965.
  • 8Mathews HH, Long BH. Endoscopy assisted percutaneous anterior interbody fusion with subcutaneous suprafascial internal fixation: evolution of technique and surgical considerations. Orthop Int ED, 1995, 3(6) :496 -500.
  • 9Foley KT, Gupta SK. 802 pereutaneous pedicle screw -rod fixation of the lumbar spine. Neurol Surg, 2001, 49(2) :536 -537.
  • 10汤晓芙.临床肌电图学[M].北京医科大学协和医科大学联合出版社,1991.167.

共引文献117

同被引文献100

引证文献9

二级引证文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部