期刊文献+

干化学法尿隐血检测的可靠性分析 被引量:5

Reliability of dry-chemistry method in detecting urine occult blood
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨干化学法尿隐血检测的可靠性。方法收集843例泌尿外科住院患者及403名体检人员的尿液标本。分析干化学法尿隐血检测与显微镜检测尿沉渣红细胞(镜检)结果的相符性。结果 843份泌尿外科尿标本中,482份干化学法尿隐血检测阳性,431份(51.1%)镜检阳性;干化学法尿隐血检测阴性与镜检阴性的相符率为98.9%。在843例泌尿外科住院患者和403名体检人员的尿液标本中,干化学法尿隐血检测结果为±、+时,两种方法检测结果相符率远低于干化学法尿隐血检测结果为阴性、++、+++时两种方法检测结果相符率(P<0.05)。两种方法检测279例泌尿系统结石患者阳性相符率最低。结论干化学法尿隐血检测可靠性欠佳,当检测结果异常时,应结合镜检报告结果进行综合判断。 Objective To investigate the reliability of dry-chemistry method in detecting urine occult blood(BLD). Methods Collected urines from 843 urological patients and 403 physical examination people who met the conditions. BLD in samples were de- tected with dry-chemistry method, erythrocytes were observed by microscope. Analyzed the differences between the two results. Re- sults 482 samples (57.2%) were tested positive in BLD,while 431 samples(51, l~)were positive in microscope detection in 843 samples from urological patients. In BLD negative samples, 98.9 % were also observed negative in microscope detection. In 843 urine specimens from urologic patients and 403 urine specimens from physical examination people, the match rate of the two methods when the results of BLO were ~+ or + was much lower than that when the results of BLO were negative, + +, + + -+- (P^0.05). In 279 specimens from patient with urinary calculi, the match rate of positive results between the two methods was the lowest one. Conclusion The reliability of dry-chemistry method in detecting urine occult blood is not satisfactory. When abnormal test result occurs,microscope detection should be combined to make a comprehensive judgment.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第18期1802-1804,共3页 Chongqing medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81072086)
关键词 尿 潜血 尿分析 显微镜检查 urine occult blood urinalysis microscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献30

  • 1彭杰雄,李贻汉.1000份尿常规检验结果对比分析[J].临床医学,2004,24(10):58-59. 被引量:2
  • 2丛玉隆,马骏龙.尿液常规自动化检查质量控制[J].临床检验杂志,1995,13(6):318-320. 被引量:32
  • 3徐银萍,王胜奎.尿液分析仪与尿沉渣镜检两种方法的比较分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2006,21(3):71-72. 被引量:28
  • 4姜傥,张式鸿,胡伟,钟武平,苏肖丽,蔡丹.一种新型尿液检测模式的探讨及其软件研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2006,29(7):608-611. 被引量:29
  • 5吴东懦.糖类的生物化学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1987.127.
  • 6Katsehinski B,Logan R,Davies J,et al.Prognosis in upper gastrointrestinal bleeding[J].Dig Dis Sci,1994,39(4):706-712.
  • 7丛玉隆 王淑娟.今日临床检验学[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1998.73-74.
  • 8Veenstra J, Smit WM, Krediet RT, et al. Relationship between elevated creatine phosphokinase and the clinical spectrum of rhabdomyolysis [J]. Neprhol Dial Transplant, 1994, 9: 637-641.
  • 9Fernandez WG, Hung O, Bruno GR, et al. Factors predictive of acute renal failure and need for hemodialysis among ED patients with rhabdomyolysis[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2005, 23 ( 1 ) : 1-7.
  • 10Zager RA. Studies of mechanisms and protective maneuvers in myoglobinuric acute renal injury[J]. Lab Invest, 1989, 60: 619-629.

共引文献95

同被引文献39

  • 1曾宪涛,李胜,雷晋,郭毅.Review Manager 5软件在诊断准确性试验的Meta分析中的应用[J].湖北医药学院学报,2013,32(1):6-16. 被引量:33
  • 2陈新谦,金有豫,汤光.新编药物学[M].17版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:3465.
  • 3Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2003,3:25.
  • 4Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5. 1. 0[ updated March 2011]. The Coehrane Collaboration, 2011[EB/OL]. http:// www. cochrane- handbook, org.
  • 5Roggeman S, Zaman Z. Safely reducing manual urine microscopy analyses by combining urine flow eytometer and strip results[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2001,116(6) :872-878.
  • 6Ben-Ezra J, Bork L, McPherson R A. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer[J]. Clin Chem, 1998,44(1) :92-95.
  • 7Chien T, Kao J, Liu H, et al. Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy[J]. Clinica Chimica Acta, 2007,384(1/2):28-34.
  • 8Pancholi P, Pavletich K, Della-Latta P. Rapid screening of urine specimens for bacteriuria by the cellenium system[J].J Clin Microbiol, 2005,43 (10) : 5288-5290.
  • 9Devill- WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, et al. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2002, 2: 9.
  • 10张天嵩,钟文昭.Meta-DiSc软件在诊断试验Meta分析中的应用[J].循证医学,2008,8(2):97-100. 被引量:110

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部