期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹结肠癌根治术后短期疗效分析 被引量:17

Short-Term Outcome Analysis of Laparoscopy-Assisted Versus Open Surgery for Colon Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析对比腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌患者术后3年的生存情况,为结肠癌的腹腔镜治疗提供数据支持。方法对笔者所在科室经腹腔镜治疗的217例患者和开腹手术治疗的193例患者进行随访,对比分析其局部复发、远处转移、穿刺孔和手术切口种植转移以及生存率情况。结果腹腔镜手术组患者术后3年的无病生存率为86.2%(187/217),总生存率为91.2%(198/217),开腹手术组的3年无病生存率为85.5%(165/193),总生存率为92.7%(179/193),2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者的局部复发、远处转移、穿刺孔和手术切口种植转移结果差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术治疗结肠癌的局部复发、远处转移、种植转移和总生存率均与开腹手术相似,说明腹腔镜手术具有良好的安全性和根治性。 Objective The survival data of patients with colon cancer who were treated by laparoscopicassisted surgery and open surgery three years after operation were analyzed and contrasted, which provided data to support the future treatment. Methods The 217 patients who were cured by laparoscopicassisted surgery and 193 patients who were cured by open surgery were followed up, and the rates of local recurrence, metastasis, implantative, and survival were contrasted and analyzed. Results Three years after laparoscopicassisted surgery and open surgery, the diseasefree survival rate was 86. 2% (187/217) and 85.5% (165/193), respectively, and the overall survival rate was 91.2% (198/217) and 92. 7% (179/193), respectively, the difference between the two groups was not statistic significance (/9〉0. 05). The differences of the rates of local recurrence, metastasis, and implantative between the two groups were not statistic signifi cance (P 〉 0. 05). Conclusions Laparoscopicassisted surgery is similar with open surgery in the rates of local recur rence, forward metastasis, and overall survival. So laparoscopicassisted surgery is a safe and radical curative surgery.
出处 《中国普外基础与临床杂志》 CAS 2012年第6期646-648,共3页 Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
关键词 结肠癌 腹腔镜手术 随访 生存率 Colon cancer Laparoscopic-assisted surgery Follow-up Survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1吴在德, 吴肇汉. 外科学 [M]. 第7 版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2008:488-489.
  • 2中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术指南(2006 版) [J]. 外科理论与实践, 2006,5(11):462-464.
  • 3Medinger M, Steinbild S, Mross K. Adjuvant and palliativeanticancer treatment of colon carcinoma in 2004 [J]. Praxis (Bern1994), 2004, 93(40):1633-1644.
  • 4Mishima H, Ikenaga M, Tsujinaka T, et al. FOLFOX [J]. GanTo Kagaku Ryoho, 2006, 33(7):911-914.
  • 5徐忠法,孙燕来.结肠癌的分期与腹腔镜结肠癌手术治疗的选择[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2008,21(3):239-241. 被引量:18
  • 6Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomyfor cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial [J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 246(4):655-662.
  • 7Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma:3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group[J]. J Clin Oncol,2007, 25(21):3061-3068.
  • 8Cummings LC, Delaney CP, Cooper GS. Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population:a cohort study [J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2012, 10:31.
  • 9王琛,李徐生,徐小东,吕西.腹腔镜外科技术在结肠癌治疗中的临床应用[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2007,14(6):644-645. 被引量:8
  • 10郁宝铭.结直肠癌外科治疗的现状和展望[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2008,15(9):631-636. 被引量:35

二级参考文献101

共引文献93

同被引文献123

引证文献17

二级引证文献229

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部