期刊文献+

湖北农村降水中SO_4^(2-)浓度变化研究 被引量:5

CHANGES OF SO_4~2- CONCENTRATION IN RAINFALL IN RURAL AREA OF HUBEI PROVINCE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在湖北农村 10个地点 ,利用澳大利亚集雨器自 1996年 1月至 1998年 6月 ,按季度采集大气降水样品测定SO2 - 4浓度 ,并对数据进行统计分析。研究结果表明 ,各地 1997年降水中SO2 - 4浓度年均值比 1996年显著升高 ;大多数地点 1996、1997、1998年 1季度和 2季度降水中SO2 - 4浓度呈逐年升高趋势 ;大多数地点每年 1、4季度降水中SO2 - 4浓度高 ,2、3季度降水中SO2 - 4浓度低 ,说明湖北农村降水中的硫对秋冬作物影响比对春夏作物影响大 ;湖北农村降水中SO2 - 4浓度近两年不仅有时间变化规律 ,而且同一季度内的地区差异也很明显 ,在 1996年和 1997年 8个季度 10个点的降水SO2 - 4浓度最大值中 ,有 4个最大值出现在襄樊 ,它是目前湖北继宜昌市区。 From January 1996 to June 1998, using rain collectors made in Australia we gathered rainfall samples from Hubei province where we arranged 10 sites in rural area and analysed the data by statistic methed. The results de monstrated that the mean values of SO 2- 4 concentration in all rainfall samples distinctly increased in 1997 compared with those in year of 1996. In spring and summer seasons the SO 2- 4 concentration increasing year after year was observed for a period of three years. The regular sulfur change pattern in rainfall must have stronger effect on autumn and winter crops than on spring and summer crops. Besides the SO 2- 4 concentration values of samples collected from differente regions were obviously disparate in the same season. Among all eight maximum values of SO 2- 4 concentration gathered from 10 sites in two test years (altogether eight seasons) four of them occured in Xiangfan district,where acid rain has takes place much more frequently right now.
机构地区 湖北大学
出处 《长江流域资源与环境》 CAS CSSCI CSCD 2000年第2期248-253,共6页 Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin
基金 国家科委立项 澳大利亚国际农业研究中心和湖北省教委资助的中澳国际合作科研项目部分成果
关键词 湖北 农村 降水 硫酸根 酸雨 rural area of Hubei province rainfall SO_4~2 acid rain
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献88

  • 1陈卉.Bland-Altman分析在临床测量方法一致性评价中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(3):308-309. 被引量:217
  • 2Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt G H. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference [J]. Control Clin Trials, 1989, 10(4) : 407-415.
  • 3Jaeschke R, Guyatt G H, Keller J, et al. Interpreting changes in quality-of-life score in N of 1 randomized trials [ J ]. Control Clin Trials, 1991, 12(4 Suppl): 226S-2335.
  • 4Stratford P W, Binkley J M, Riddle D L, et al. Sensitivity to change of the Roland- Morris Back Pain Questionnaire : part 1 [J]. Phys Ther, 1998, 78(11): 1186-1196.
  • 5van Walraven C, Mahon J L, Moher D, et al. Surveying physicians to determine the minimal important difference: implications for sample- size calculation [ J ] . J Clin Epidemiol, 1999, 52(8) : 717-723.
  • 6van der Roer N, Ostelo R W, Bekkering G E, et al. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain [J]. Spine, 2006, 31(5): 578-582.
  • 7Beaton D E, Boers M, Wells G A. Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference ( MCID ) : a literature review and directions for future research [ J ]. Curr Opin Rheumatol, 2002, 14(2) : 109-114.
  • 8Beaton D E. Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness [ J ] . Spine, 2000, 25 (24) : 3192-3199.
  • 9Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A, et al. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain [ J]. Eur Spine J, 2003, 12(1 ) : 12- 20.
  • 10Bohon J E. Sensitivity and specificity of outcome measures in patients with neck pain: detecting clinically significant improvement [J]. Spine, 2004, 29 (21) : 2410-2417; discussion 2418.

共引文献141

同被引文献98

引证文献5

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部