期刊文献+

油价冲击、货币政策调整与产出波动——基于中国的经验证据 被引量:6

OILPRICESHOCKS,MONET ARYPOLICYADJUSTMENT AND OUTPUTVOLATILITY ——Empirical Evidence from China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于我国2001—2010年宏观经济月度数据,采用SVAR模型分析了国际油价波动时,央行货币政策在排除回应油价干扰与未排除干扰下的反应差异及油价波动对产出的影响。研究发现,在排除货币政策回应油价波动干扰后,通过脉冲响应函数反映的油价波动对产出的短期负面影响消失。方差分解结果显示,长期内产出波动由油价冲击和货币政策解释的比例分别为5.716%和32.480%,比排除干扰前分别下降了2.569%和4.560%。这说明我国油价冲击带来的经济衰退主要是因为货币政策及其回应油价冲击紧缩所致。此外,面对油价的短期冲击,CPI指数并未随着生产者购进价格指数上升而上升,产出也未发生明显的衰减;但在较长时间内,油价上升会因为相对价格的改变,而影响CPI水平和货币政策,从而对产出产生显著的负面影响。 Based on the macroeconomic monthly data in 2001—2010in China,using the SVAR model,the paper analyzed the reaction difference of the central bank’s monetary policy between including and excluding responses to oil interference,and the impact of oil price fluctuations on the output.Empirical evidence showed that,after excluding responses of monetary policy to oil prices fluctuation interference,the short-term negative impact on output by oil prices fluctuation reflected through the impulse response function disappeared.The variance decomposition results showed that oil price shocks and monetary policy account for 5.716%and 32.480%respectively in explaining output volatility.Comparing to the data where the interference had not been ruled out,it decreased 2.569%and 4.560%respectively.It indicated that the economic recession brought by the oil price shocks mainly due to the tightening monetary policy responses to oil price shocks.Facing the short-term impact of oil prices,CPI did not increase with the rising of producer price index and the output also had no obvious decrease.But in the long term,due to the changes of relative prices,the rising of oil prices would affect the level of CPI and monetary policies thereby had a significant negative impact on output.
出处 《经济理论与经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第7期17-27,共11页 Economic Theory and Business Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70971034) 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(10YJCZH140)
关键词 油价冲击 货币政策 产出波动 SVAR模型 oil price shocks monetary policy output volatility SVAR model
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献106

共引文献367

同被引文献104

  • 1廖楚晖,刘鹏.中国公共资本对私人资本替代关系的实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005,22(7):35-43. 被引量:25
  • 2郭田勇.资产价格、通货膨胀与中国货币政策体系的完善[J].金融研究,2006(10):23-35. 被引量:139
  • 3张屹山,张代强.前瞻性货币政策反应函数在我国货币政策中的检验[J].经济研究,2007,42(3):20-32. 被引量:184
  • 4曼昆.经济学原理[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009:223-335.
  • 5许光建,苏汝劫,陈璋.应用经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007:85-127.
  • 6Backus, D.K. & M. J. Crucini(2000), "Oil prices and the terms of trade", Journal of International Economics 50 (1):185-213.
  • 7Barbanchon, T. L. (2007), "The changing response to oil price shocks in France: A DSGE type approach", INSEE Working Paper.
  • 8Calvo, G. (1983), "Staggered prices in a utility maximizing framework", Journal of Morletary Economics 7 : 383 - 398.
  • 9Carlstrom, C.T. & T. S. Fuerst(2006), "Oil price, monetary policy, and counterfactual experiments", Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 38(7) :1945-1958.
  • 10Christiano, L. , M. Eichenbaum - C. Evans(2005), "Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy", Journal of Political Economy 113(1): 1-45.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部