期刊文献+

胸腔积液细胞块免疫组化染色的病理诊断价值 被引量:23

Significance of cell block immunohistochemistry in diagnosis of pleural effusions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨细胞块切片免疫组化染色对胸腔积液病理诊断与鉴别诊断的应用价值。方法收集78例患者胸腔积液,分别行常规细胞涂片和细胞块切片,HE染色观察细胞的形态特点,免疫组化S-P法检测CK7、MOC-31、CD15、BerEP4、CEA、TTF-1、CK5/6、Calretinin、WT-1和Desmin的表达,筛选肺腺癌和间皮病变鉴别诊断相关的免疫标记组合。分析临床与随访资料与不同细胞学诊断方法结果之间的差异。结果细胞块制片阳性检出率高于常规细胞涂片,二者HE染色对胸腔积液细胞阳性检出率无显著性差异(P>0.05)。细胞块免疫组化明显优于单纯细胞涂片,二者比较具有显著差异性(χ2=4.17,P<0.01),其对恶性胸腔积液的分型诊断符合率达97.2%,组合性抗体检测显示,肺腺癌中CK7、MOC-31、CD15、BerEP4、CEA、TTF-1呈高表达,间皮病变显示CK5/6、Calretinin、WT-1、Desmin高表达。结论胸腔积液细胞块对诊断恶性胸腔积液具有一定的价值,结合免疫组化选择适当的抗体组合对肺腺癌和恶性间皮瘤的鉴别诊断具有一定的意义,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To compare the difference between cell smear and cell block in differential diagnosis of pleural effusions,and to investigate the methods for differential diagnosis between lung adenocarcinoma and malignant mesothelioma.Methods Seventy-eight cases of pleural effusions were examined using cell smear and cell block,respectively.Cell morphology was observed by HE staining.Expression of CK7,MOC-31,CD15,BerEP4,CEA,TTF-1,CK5/6,calretinin,WT-1 and desmin were detected by SP immunohistochemical assay.The association of clinical and follow-up data with different cytology diagnostic methods was analyzed.Results The positive detection rate of the cell block was higher than that of the cell smear,but the positive detection rate by HE staining showed no significant difference between the two methods.The accordance rate of the cell block immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion was 46.2%,which was significantly higher than that of the cell smear(Chi-square=4.17,P〈0.01).CK7,MOC-31,CD15,BerEP4,CEA and TTF-1 were highly expressed in lung adenocarcinoma,whereas CK5/6,calretinin,WT-1 and desmin were highly expressed in malignant mesothelioma and mesothelial reactive hyperplasia.Conclusion Cell block has a certain diagnostic value for malignant pleural effusion,and its combination with immunohistochemistry and complex antibodies is helpful for the differential diagnosis between lung adenocarcinoma and malignant mesothelioma.
出处 《第三军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第15期1568-1571,共4页 Journal of Third Military Medical University
关键词 细胞涂片 细胞块 胸腔积液 免疫组化 鉴别诊断 cell smear cell block pleural effusion immunohistochemistry differential diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献40

  • 1王红梅,周小鸽.TTF-1在肺癌诊断及鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J].诊断病理学杂志,2005,12(6):441-443. 被引量:35
  • 2陈家林 张亚萍.不同分子量细胞角蛋白联合检测在肺腺癌及鳞癌鉴别诊断的应用[J].中国肿瘤临床,2001,28:319-319.
  • 3Kim YM, Park YK, Yan JY, et al. Expression of the GLUT glucose transporterlng all bladder carcinomas [ J ]. Gastroenterel Hepatol, 2002, 49(46) : 907-911.
  • 4Kunkel M, Reichert TE, Benz P, et al. Overexpression of GLUT- land increased glucose metabolism in tumors areassociated with a poor prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma [ J ]. Cancer, 2003, 97(4) : 1015-1024.
  • 5Burstein DE, Reder I, Weiser K, et al. GLUT1 glucose transporter: A highly sensitive marker of malignancy in body cavity effusions[ J]. Mod Pathol, 1998, 11(4) :392-396.
  • 6AfifyA, Zhou H, Howell L, et al. Diagnostic utility of GLUT-1 expression in the cytologic evaluation of serous fluids [ J ]. Acta Cytol, 2005, 49(6) : 621-626.
  • 7Mensch LS, WeUer L, Simmons Arnold L, et al. GLUT1 antibody staining in thin-layer specimens of benign and malignant body cavity effusions[J]. Acta Cytol, 2002, 46(5) :813-818.
  • 8Hink GW. Introduction of eyclooxygenase-2 by interleukin-1 alpha evidence for posttranseripfional regulation[J]. J Biol Chem, 2004, 269 ( 11 ) : 769-775.
  • 9Mu YC, Tsai MC. Nentrephil elastase stimulates human airway epithelial cell to produce PGE2 through activation of p44/42MAPK and up- regulation of eycooxygenase-2[ J]. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 2007, 285(4) : 925-930.
  • 10Feng-Qi Zhao and Aileen F Keafing. Function properties and genomics of glucose transporters [ J ]. Curr Genomics, 2007, 8 (2) : 113 -128.

共引文献30

同被引文献129

  • 1苏学英,李甘地,唐应成.MOC-31在浆膜腔积液转移性腺癌、间皮瘤和增生间皮细胞中表达的检测价值[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2005,36(5):734-735. 被引量:3
  • 2王超,周小鸽,余小蒙.细胞块免疫细胞化学和原位杂交在针吸细胞学中应用[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2006,22(1):96-97. 被引量:27
  • 3熊盛道,徐国鹏,熊维宁,高永平,倪望,陈仕新.白细胞介素-18和腺苷脱氨酶联合检测鉴别结核性与恶性胸腔积液的价值[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2007,30(10):779-780. 被引量:5
  • 4Myong NH. Thyroid transcription factor-1 ( TTF-1 ) expression in hu- man lung carcinomas:its prognostic implication and relationship with expression of p53 and Ki-67 proteins[ J]. J Korean Med Sci,2003,18 (4) :494-500.
  • 5Kaufmann O, Dietel M. Thyroid transerip tion factor-1 is the superior immunohistochemieal marker for pulmonary adenocareinomas and large cell carcinomas compared to surfactant proteinsA and B [ J ]. Histopathology,2000,36( 1 ) :8-16.
  • 6Swiderek J,Morcos S,Donthireddy V. Prospective study to determine the volume of pleural fluid required to diagnose malignancy[J].CHEST,2010,(01):68-73.
  • 7Thapar M, Mishra R K, Sharma A, et al. Critical analysis of cellblock versus smear examination in effusions[J]. J Cytol, 2009, 26(2): 60-64.
  • 8Tsai T H, Wu S G, Chang Y L, et al. Effusion immunocytochemistryas an alternative approach for the selection of first-Line targetedtherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma [J], J Thorac Oncol,2012,7(6): 993-1000.
  • 9Shivakumarswamy U, Arakeri S U, Karigowdar M H, et al. Diag-nostic utility of the cell block method versus the conventionalsmear study in pleural fluid cytology[J]. J Cytol, 2012, 29(1): 11-15.
  • 10Bhanvadia M V, Santwani P M, Vachhani J H. Analysis of diagnos-tic value of cytological smear method versus cell block method inbody fluid cytology: study of 150 cases [J]. Ethiop J Health Sci,2014, 24(2): 125-131.

引证文献23

二级引证文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部