期刊文献+

食品安全的“可信性”——基于“公众参与”的分析 被引量:4

The "credibility" of food safety——the analysis based on "public engagement"
原文传递
导出
摘要 长期以来食品安全的"可信性"依靠"科学的"标准,科学变成了决策的依据。但是科学本身的不确定性不但使科学所树立的权威形象难以维持,而且还可能给政治决策带来失误,层出不穷的食品安全问题使科学与政治备受质疑。科学所面临的"可信性"危机使人们开始从科学内部反思科学在解决问题中是否充分。对公众维度的忽视,是问题不能彻底解决的重要原因。具有经验型技能的公众参与科学,不但使公众的参与从口号走向了现实,也使科学从独断走向生活。食品安全的"可信性"是科学、政治、公众三者共同参与的结果,公众的介入使"科学的可信性"更加充分。 The "credibility" of food safety relies on " scientific" standards for a long time, so science becomes the basis of decision - making. However, as the uncertainty exists in science itself, it is not only difficult to maintain authority image established by science, but also possibly results in faults of political decision - making. Science and politics are being questioned because of the endlessly food safety issues. Facing the credibility crisis in science, people have to reflect the adequacy of science in solving problems from internal science. The important cause that is not to completely solve problems is neglect of the public dimension. The public with experience engage in science, which not only make public participation from slogan to reality, but also impel science from arbitrariness to life. The " credibility" of food safety is presented by co -involvement of science, politics and public. Moreover, public engagement makes " scientific credibility" more full.
作者 赵喜凤 蔡仲
机构地区 南京大学哲学系
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第8期1128-1133,1205,共7页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划基金(10YJA720001) 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(CXZZ12-0004)
关键词 食品安全 可信性 科学 公众参与 技能 food safety credibility science public engagement expertise
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1乌尔利希·贝克.风险社会[M].南京:译林出版社,2004:58-66.
  • 2高新华,高云.食品安全认证系统——HACCP[J].当代畜禽养殖业,2011(3):48-50. 被引量:3
  • 3单之玮,佟建明.HACCP应用现状及前景[J].中国农业科技导报,2003,5(1):53-56. 被引量:25
  • 4哈里·科林斯,特雷弗·平奇.人人应知的技术[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2000.147-153.
  • 5Sheila Jasanoff. Civilization and madness: the great BSE scare of 1996 [ J ]. Public Understanding of Science, 6 1997,221 - 232.
  • 6Collins H M,Evans R. The third wave of science stud- ies: studies of expertise and experience [ J ]. Social Studies of Science, 2002, 32 (2) :235 -296.
  • 7Steven Shapin. Expertise, common sense and the atkin diet[A]. Porter J M,P Phillips W B . Public Science in Liberal Democracy[ C ]. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. 174 - 193.
  • 8Penfers B , Nelis A P. Credibility engineering in the food industry: linking science, regulation, and marketing in a corporate context[J]. Science in Context, 2011, 24 (4) : 487 -515.
  • 9Brian Wynne. Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of science[ A ]. Alan Irwin and Brian Wynne. Misunderstanding Science? The Pub- lic Reconstruction of Science and Technology[ C ]. Cam- bridge University Press, 1996.19 - 46.
  • 10陈烨菲.如何鉴别是不是“瘦肉精”猪肉[EB/OL].http://health, people, com. cn/GB/14405344, html 2011 - 04 - 16/2011 - 05 - 20.

二级参考文献2

共引文献28

同被引文献51

引证文献4

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部