期刊文献+

手辅助腹腔镜手术在胃肠外科中的应用及适应证选择 被引量:13

Application and indication choice of hand-assistedlaparoscopic operation in gastrointestinal surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 尽管传统腹腔镜技术在胃肠道良恶性疾病中的应用逐步获得广泛的认可,但仍有学习曲线延长、手术时间延长、技术难度增加以及肥胖患者手术复杂性等不足。手辅助腹腔镜技术(HALS)作为介于开腹手术与腹腔镜手术的一种杂交技术.由于恢复了手的触觉以及手眼协调.弥补了传统腹腔镜手术的不足.同时部分保留了传统腹腔镜手术的微创优势,且手术时间及学习曲线明显缩短.在肥胖患者及复杂的胃肠手术中具有一定优势。但HALS手术也存在手对术野的阻挡和手疲劳等不足.HALS治疗恶性肿瘤的近远期疗效尚待更多的循证学研究加以证实。 Despite gaining wider popularity in the management of both benign and malignant gastrointestinal diseases over the past decade, traditional laparoscopic surgery remains to be associated with several distinct disadvantages, including longer operative time, longer learning curve, technical difficulty in obese patients and complicated cases. As a hybrid technique between open surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) brings back tacktile feeling and hand-to-eye coorrdination to surgeons. It allows surgeons to perform more complicated gastrointestinal surgery, while retaining the merits of traditional laparoscopic surgery. It also improves operative time and learning curve. The main disadvantages of HALS seem to be the hindering effect and fatigue of the inserted hand. The exact role of HALS in gastrointestinal surgery has not been well defined due to lack of substantial evidences from clinical trials.
作者 王自强
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS 2012年第8期796-798,共3页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
关键词 手助腹腔镜 胃肠外科 适应证 Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery Gastrointestinal surgery Indications
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2010,97( 11 ) : 1638-1645.
  • 2Chinical Outcomes of Surgery Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med, 2004,350(20):2050-2059.
  • 3Ou H. Laparoscopic-assisted mini laparatomy with colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum, 1995,38 (3) : 324-326.
  • 4Chung CC, Ng DC, Tsang WW, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy : a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg, 2007,246 (5) : 728-733.
  • 5Yin WY, Wei CK, Tseng KC, et al. Open colectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted colectomy supported by hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy for resectable colorectal cancer: a comparative study with minimum follow-up of three years. Hepatogastroenterology, 2009,56(93) :998-1006.
  • 6Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy : a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc, 2004,18(4) :577-581.
  • 7Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg, 2004,240 (6) : 984-992.
  • 8Polle SW, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctoeolectomy: long-term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc, 2007,21(8) : 1301-1307.
  • 9Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008,51 (6) :818-828.
  • 10Targarona EM, Gracia E, Garriga J, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy : applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16(2) : 234-239.

同被引文献112

引证文献13

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部