期刊文献+

寰枢椎后路悬臂樑支撑线缆牵拉复位固定的生物力学稳定性评价 被引量:4

The biomechanical stability of cable dragged reduction and cantilever beam internal fixation by posterior atlantoaxial approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:目前治疗齿状突骨折致寰枢椎脱位的内固定方式多种多样,但均强调固定前复位,尚无一种既有满意的生物力学稳定性,又有较好的术中复位能力的内固定方式。目的:分析后路悬臂樑支撑线缆牵拉复位固定技术这一新的内固定方式的生物力学性能。方法:取12具新鲜尸体寰枢椎骨韧带标本,制成齿状突Anderson2型骨折试验模型,对每一标本先后行Brooks钛缆固定、Magerl螺钉固定、双侧寰枢椎侧块螺钉+枢椎椎弓根螺钉固定和悬臂樑支撑线缆牵拉复位固定,在1.5Nm载荷下模拟人体的寰枢椎三维运动,并用三维扫描仪对寰枢椎的三维运动范围进行测量。结果与结论:在1.5Nm载荷作用下,经后路悬臂樑支撑线缆牵拉复位内固定的寰枢椎前屈、左右侧弯范围均小于其他各组(P<0.05);后伸范围大于Magerl螺钉固定组(P<0.05),小于Brooks钢丝固定和钉棒固定组(P<0.05);左右旋转范围与Magerl螺钉固定组无差异(P>0.05),但小于Brooks钢丝固定组和钉棒固定组(P<0.05)。结果可见后路悬臂樑支撑线缆牵拉复位固定的三维稳定性优于双侧寰枢椎侧块螺钉+枢椎椎弓根螺钉固定和Brooks钛缆固定;仅在后伸方面稳定性不及Magerl螺钉。 BACKGROUND: There are many methods of internal fixation for atlantoaxial dislocation caused by odontoid fractures, but all of them emphasize reset before fixation, so there is no a internal fixation both with satisfactory biomechanical stability and better intraoperative reset ability. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the biomechanical properties of cable dragged reduction and cantilever beam internal fixation via posterior approach for upper cervical spine stability. METHODS: Occipitocervical spine specimens from twelve fresh human cadaveric were selected to establish fracture test model of odontoid Anderson type 2 which were mounted in a spine-testing machine to record the three-dimensional angular movement under 1.5 N.m load. The specimens were fixed by Brooks titanium cable, Magerl screws, the lateral mass screws in the atlas+axial pedicle screw and cable dragged reduction and cantilever beam. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Under 1.5 N-m load, the range of motion (ROM) during flexion and side bending of cable dragged reduction and cantilever beam internal fixation group were significantly smaller than those of other groups (P 〈 0.05). The ROM during in extension of cable dragged reduction and cantilever beam internal fixation group was significantly larger than that of Magerl screws fixation group (P 〈 0.05), but which was smaller than that of the Brooks titanium cable and pedicle screw fixation groups (P 〈 0.05). The ROM during rotation of cable dragged reduction and cantilever beam and Magerl screws fixation groups had no difference (P 〉 0.05), but which was smaller than that of the Brooks titanium cable and pedicle screw fixation groups (P 〈 0.05). The results indicated that stability of cable dragged reduction and cantilever beam internal fixation via posterior approach are better than the other groups, but which was only lower than Magerl screws fixation in the stability of the extension.
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS CSCD 2012年第30期5558-5562,共5页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Harms J,Melcher RP. Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2001,(22):2467-2471.
  • 2Kuroki H,Rengachary SS,Goel VK. Biomechanical comparison of two stabilization techniques of the atlantoaxial joints:transarticular screw fixation versus screw and rod fixation[J].Neurosurgery,2005,(1 Suppl):151-159.
  • 3Henriques T,Cunningham BW,Olerud C. Biomechanical comparison of five different atlantoaxial posterior fixation techniques[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2000,(22):2877-2883.
  • 4Kim SM,Lim TJ,Paterno J. Biomechanical comparison of anterior and posterior stabilization methods in atlantoaxial instability[J].Journal of Neurosurgery,2004,(3 Suppl Spine):277-283.
  • 5Panjabi M,Dvorak J,Duranceau J. Three-dimensional movements of the upper cervical spine[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1988,(07):726-730.
  • 6卢一生,贾连顺,丁祖泉,戴力扬.寰枢关节的三维运动规律及其测量[J].中华创伤杂志,1995,11(1):1-3. 被引量:48
  • 7贾连顺;李家顺.颈椎外科学[M]上海:上海科学技术出版社,200448-49.
  • 8Naderi S,Crawford NR,Song GS. Biomechanical comparison of C1-C2 posterior fixations.Cable,graft,and screw combinations[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1998,(18):1946-1955.
  • 9Ma XY,Yin QS,Wu ZH. C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws:comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2009,(04):371-377.
  • 10马向阳,尹庆水,吴增晖,夏虹,刘景发,赵卫东,麦小红.寰枢椎后路四种钉棒固定方法的三维稳定性评价[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2008,18(6):464-468. 被引量:54

二级参考文献12

  • 1马向阳,尹庆水,夏虹,吴增晖,钟世镇,刘景发,徐达传.枢椎后路侧块螺钉固定的解剖研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2004,14(7):417-420. 被引量:9
  • 2马向阳,尹庆水,刘景发,吴增晖,夏虹,昌耘冰,章凯,麦小红.C_(2/3)经关节螺钉固定的临床应用解剖研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(8):595-597. 被引量:9
  • 3马向阳,尹庆水,吴增晖,夏虹,刘景发,麦小红.枢椎椎板螺钉固定的解剖可行性研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(1):48-51. 被引量:37
  • 4樊健,赵剑,邵菁菁,刘璠,管国平,邵云伟,张辉,王以进.颈椎前路静力性与动力性钉板系统在三柱不稳定损伤中生物力学性能的比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(4):265-267. 被引量:7
  • 5Richter M, Schmidt R, Claes L, et al. Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: hiomechanical in vitro comparison of six different techniques. Spine, 2002, 27:1724
  • 6Hanley EN, Harvell JC. Immediate postoperative stability of the atlantoaxial articulation: a biomechanical study comparing simple midline wiring and the gallic and brooks procedures. J Spinal Disord, 1992, 5 : 306
  • 7Gallic W. Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. Am J Surg, 1939, 46:495
  • 8Kandziora F, Kerschbaumer F, Starker M, et al. Biomechanical assessment of transoral plate fixation for atlantoaxial instability. Spine, 2000, 25:1555
  • 9Herring JA, Wenger DR. Segmental spinal instrumentation: a preliminary report of 40 consecutive cases. Spine, 1982, 7:285
  • 10Naderi S, Crawford NR, Song GS, et al. Biomechanical comparison of C1 - C2 posterior fixations: cable, graft, and screw combination. Spine, 1998, 23:1946

共引文献110

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部