摘要
西方政治哲学的论证重心经历了一种从政治的道德目的到政治的道德基础的转换。古代的政治伦理学通常把政治的道德基础看作一种自然因素,故而对此并不着力论证,却着重于赋予政治以道德目的;近代以来的西方政治伦理学则认为政治关系是人为的,从而对政治的道德基础详加论证,但许多学者对政治的道德目的却心存疑虑。实际上,只有对政治的道德基础严加论证之后,政治的道德目的才能更好地加以确定。
The focus of argumentation of western political philosophy experienced a transformation from politics＇ moral goal to politics＇ moral basis. In ancient time, political philosophy usually took politics＇ moral basis as a natural elements with few attention on it, so they focused on argumentation politics＇ moral goal;since modern times, political philosophy argued that political relations are man, so they heavily focused on arguing politics＇ moral basis, however, there were some doubts in their mind about politics＇ moral goal. Actually, only when politics＇ moral basis is rigidly argued, can we define politics＇ moral goal.
出处
《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
北大核心
2012年第4期41-53,共13页
Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"美德政治学的功能及其限度"(09BZX051)
江西省社会科学规划课题"西方正义理论的论证方法探讨"(10ZX13)
关键词
西方政治哲学
政治道德目的
政治道德基础
论证
western political philosophy
politics＇ moral goal
politics＇ moral basis
transformation
argumentation
