期刊文献+

逆动态的跨语言研究 被引量:15

Antipassive from a typological perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 逆动态属于语态范畴,常见于作格语言。其派生方式是对底层及物句的(直接)宾语进行操作,使相关的句子变成不及物句。逆动态也存在于宾格语言中,主动、被动、逆动三种语态具有跨语言共性。本文首先讨论逆动态的特点及跨语言表现,然后分别讨论作格语言逆动句的特点及分类、逆动态在宾格语言英语中的研究。文章最后指出,汉语的"把"字句与逆动态有相当高的一致性,是逆动态在汉语中的具体表现,可以纳入语言共性行列中。 As a voice category typically found in ergative languages,antipassive is derived by demoting the direct object in the underlying active-transitive construction,thereby making the construction an intransitive one.Also occurring in accusative languages,the antipassive voice,like the active and the passive voice,constitutes a cross-linguistically universal grammatical phenomenon.This paper first discusses the properties and cross-linguistic manifestations of antipassive,its characteristics and classification in ergative languages,and then reviews the study of antipassives in English as an ergative language.It is found that that there exists a high correlation between the antipassive construction and the Chinese ba construction,and that as a realization of the antipassive voice in Chinese,the ba construction could also be regarded as a linguistic universal.
作者 叶狂 潘海华
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期221-229,328,共9页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 香港政府RGC资助的GRF项目(CityU146509 CityU148607)的研究成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Aldridge, E. 2012. Antipassive and ergativity in Tagalog [J]. Lingua 122: 192-203.
  • 2Beach, M. 2003. Asymmetries between passivization and antipassivization in the Tarramiutut subdialect of Inuktitut [A]. In M. Butt & T. H. King (eds.). Proceedings of the LFG03 Conference [C]. University at Albany, State University of New York. CSLI: CSLI Publications.
  • 3Bittner, M. 1987. On the semantics of the Greenlandic antipassive and related constructions [J]. IJAL 53, 2: 194-231.
  • 4Blight, R. C. 2004. Head Movement, Passive, and Antipassive in English [D]. PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
  • 5Campbell, L. 2000. Valency-changing derivations in K'iche' [A]. In R. Dixon & A. Aikhenvald (eds.). Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity [C]. Cambridge :Cambridge University Press, 236-281.
  • 6Comrie, B. 1978. Ergativity [A]. In W. P. Lehmann (ed.). Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language [C]. Austin: University of Texas Press, 329-394.
  • 7Comrie, B. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (2nd edn.) [M]. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 8Cooreman, A. 1994. A functional typology of antipassives [A]. In B. Fox &P. J. Hopper (eds.). Voice: Form and Function [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 49-87.
  • 9Davies, W. & L. Sam-Colop. 1990. K'iche' and the structure of antipassive [J]. Language 66, 3: 522-549.
  • 10Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

同被引文献278

引证文献15

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部