摘要
目的：探讨全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折患者的方法,比较两者的临床疗效.方法：笔者所在医院120 例老年股骨颈骨折患者,随机分为A、B 两组,A 组行全髋关节置换术,B 组行半髋关节置换术,术后随访12～60 个月.结果：两组患者在手术时间、术中失血量及引流量方面比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）.采用Harris 评分标准,A 组优良率95.0%,B 组优良率93.3%.两组在整体评分方面比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）.结论：全髋关节置换术和半髋关节置换术在治疗老年股骨颈骨折患者均能获得较好的疗效,但半髋关节置换术相比全髋关节置换术创伤小.
Objective ：To explore the methods about the total hip replacement and hip joint replacement for the older patients who with femoral neck fracture, compared the both clinical curative effect.Methods ：120 older patients who with femoral neck fracture, were randomly divided into two groups, A and B, group A underwent total hip arthroplasty, and group B underwent hip joint replacement, the patients were followed-up for 12-60 months.Results ：Compared between the two groups of patients in operation time, intraoperative blood loss and drainage in comparison, the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. With Harris standard, the excellent and good rate of group A was 95.0%, the excellent and good rate of group B was 93.3%.Two groups in the overall score had no significant difference（P〉0.05）.Conclusion ：The total hip replacement and hip joint replacement in the treatment of the older patients who with femoral neck fracture can obtain satisfactory curative effect, but hip joint replacement compared with total hip arthroplasty has the little trauma.
出处
《中外医学研究》
2012年第22期67-68,共2页
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词
髋关节置换术
股骨颈骨折
护理研究
Hip replacement
Femoral neck fracture
Nursing research
