期刊文献+

自我-他人医疗决策差异研究 被引量:6

A Study on Self-other Medical Decision Making Difference
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:考察医疗情境中,自我决策与为他人提供建议是否存在决策偏差,并基于解释水平的理论,解释这种偏差的由来。方法:改编Ficchhoff等使用过的医疗决策问题,分别以正/负框架(2)×自我/他人(2)进行描述。355名临床专业大学生被随机分为四组完成决策任务。结果:社会距离对医疗决策影响显著(χ2=8.636,P=0.003),自我决策与向他人建议相比,被试更倾向短期获益,长期受损的保守方案。框架效应对医疗决策影响显著(χ2=9.804,P=0.002),正性框架相比负性框架,被试更倾向短期受损,长期获益的手术方案。解释水平与框架效应交互作用显著:正性框架中,自我-他人决策差异显著(χ2=12.309,P<0.001),自我决策更倾向手术方案,负性框架中,自我-他人决策无显著差异(χ2=0.706,P=0.401);自我决策中,框架效应不显著(χ2=0.91,P=0.340),向他人建议,框架效应显著(χ2=13.256,P<0.001)。结论:社会距离与框架描述对医疗决策存在影响。 Objective: To explore whether self-other decision making difference exsist in medical situation and to explain this difference based on the Construal Level Theory. Methods: 355 clinical undergraduates were randomly assigned to four groups and investigated with questionnaire adapted from Ficchhoff's medical decision making problem which were described in positive-negative frame (2)xself-other form (2). Results: Social distance had significant impact on decision making (χ2=8.636,P=0.003). Compared with giving advice to others, self decision making was more prone to chemical treatment of short-term benefit hut long-term loss. Framing effect existed in medical situation (χ2=9.804,P=0.002). People tended to choose operation option of long-term benefit in positive frame; otherwise people tended to choose chemical treatment. In positive frame, there was a significant defference between self-other decision making (χ2=12.309, P〈0.001); while in negative frame, this defference was not significant(χ2=0.706,P=-0.401). Framing effect was significant when the decision was made for others (χ2=13.256, P〈0.001), but not significant for decision maker himself (χ2=0.91, P=-0.340). Conclusion: Social distance and frame description have significant impacts on medical decision making.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期477-479,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 军队医药卫生科研项目(10SY01)的资助
关键词 医疗决策 社会距离 框架效应 Medical decision making Social distance Framing effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Dhar R, Kim EY. Seeing the forest or the trees: Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2007, 17:96-100.
  • 2柴俊武,赵广志,何伟.解释水平对品牌联想和品牌延伸评估的影响[J].心理学报,2011,43(2):175-187. 被引量:38
  • 3李雁晨,周庭锐,周琇.解释水平理论:从时间距离到心理距离[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(4):667-677. 被引量:114
  • 4Trope Y, Liberman N, wakslak C. Construal levels and psy- chological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2007, 17:83-95.
  • 5徐惊蛰,谢晓非.解释水平视角下的自己-他人决策差异[J].心理学报,2011,43(1):11-20. 被引量:94
  • 6Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 1981, 211 (4481): 453-457.
  • 7Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47:263-291.
  • 8Parker AM, Ficchhoff B. Decision-making competence: Ex- ternal validation through an individual-differences approa- ch. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2005, 18:1-27.
  • 9Sagristano MD, Trope Y, Liberman N. Time-dependent gambling: odds now, money later. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: General. 131(3): 364-376.
  • 10Tversky A, Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

二级参考文献135

  • 1庄锦英.情绪、边框影响决策认知过程的实验研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1340-1343. 被引量:20
  • 2刘雪峰,张志学,梁钧平.认知闭合需要、框架效应与决策偏好[J].心理学报,2007,39(4):611-618. 被引量:66
  • 3Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal. Psychological Science, 19(2), 161-167.
  • 4Armor, D. A., & Sackett, A. M. (2006). Accuracy, error, and bias in predictions for real versus hypothetical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (4), 583-600.
  • 5Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609-622.
  • 6Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136(4), 610-622.
  • 7Bilgin, B., & Brenner, L. (2008). Temporal distance moderates description dependence of subjective probability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44(3), 890-895.
  • 8Day, S. B., & Bartels, D. M. (2004). Temporal distance, event representation, and similarity. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, IL.
  • 9Day, S. B., & Bartels, D. M. (2006). Representation across time: Generalizing temporal effects on perceived similarity. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, Canada.
  • 10Day, S. B., & Barrels, D. M. (2008). Representation over time: The effects of temporal distance on similarity. Cognition, 106, 1504-1513.

共引文献222

同被引文献39

  • 1McGuire,Amy L.JD,PhD McCullough,Laurence B.PhD,郭肖华,阎茹(译).医生是否应该让患者参与医疗决策[J].医学与哲学,2005,26(12X):79-80. 被引量:14
  • 2李振良,李肖峰,徐康平.患者亲属——医疗决策的重要主体[J].医学与哲学(B),2007,28(2):4-7. 被引量:27
  • 3D′AmourD,DubiosCA,TchouaketE,etal.Theoccurrenceofadverseeventspotentiallyattributabletonursingcareinmedicalunits:crosssectionalrecordreview[J].IntJNursStud,2014,51(6):882-891.
  • 4TverskyA,KahnemanD.Theframingofdecisionsandthepsychologyofchoice[J].Science,1981,211(4481):453-458.
  • 5AlmashatS,AyotteB,EdelsteinB,etal.Framingeffectdebiasinginmedicaldecisionmaking[J].PatientEducCouns,2008,71(1):102-107.
  • 6DavisonBJ,BreckonE.Factorsinfluencingtreatmentdeci-sionmakingandinformationpreferencesofprostatecancerpatientsonactivesurveillance[J].PatientEducCouns,2012,87(3):369-374.
  • 7LiuY,ZhaoG,LiF,etal.Nursing-relatedpatientsafetyeventsinhospitals[J].JHuazhongUnivSciTechnologMedSci,2009,29(2):265-268.
  • 8vanGaalBG,SchoonhovenL,HulscherME,etal.Thede-signoftheSAFEorSORRY-study:aclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogram forthepreventionofadverseevents[J].BMCHealthServRes,2009,9:58.
  • 9钱宗鸣,朱宁.患者在医疗决策中的作用[J].医学与哲学(B),2008,29(8):3-5. 被引量:16
  • 10朱华桂,曾向东.基于突发事件受众个体视角的危机决策研究[J].江海学刊,2009(1):214-218. 被引量:5

引证文献6

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部