期刊文献+

美国SOPA议案评析及其对我国网络知识产权立法的启示 被引量:1

Analysis on SOPA and What Can Be Learned from SOPA for IP Legislation Under the Network Environment in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在网络环境下,现有知识产权制度已无法适应保护知识产权的需要,各国都在酝酿知识产权制度变革。作为知识产权保护的急先锋,美国推出了SOPA议案,该议案在制止知识产权网络侵权方面采用了很多创新举措,因而受到了权利人的一致欢迎。但SOPA议案采用的创新举措过于激进,会引发株连无辜网站、妨碍言论自由以及危害网络产业发展等不良后果,导致其饱受争议、通过受阻。我国网络知识产权立法应从SOPA议案的折戟中吸收教训,一方面要迎合我国公共政策的需要,另一方面要遵循"比例原则"体现出来的平衡理念。 Under the network environment, the current intellectual property system cannot meet the need of protecting intellectual property anymore, so the reform of intellectual property system has been undergoing in each country. As a daring henchman in respect of protecting intellectual property, SOPA was offered for public discussion in US. The SOPA adopts many creative measures to prevent the intellectual property infringements, so it was welcomed unanimously by intellectual property owners. However, some of these creative measures taken by SOPA are too aggressive, which would lead to the result of punishing innocent websites, impeding the principle of free speech, and destroying the development of network industry, so it was trapped in argtanents and cannot adopt in the congress. The legislation of intellectual property under network environment in China should leam from the failure of SOPA, which means that the legislation shall not only cater to public policies in China, but also follow the idea of keeping balance embodied in the principle of proportionality.
作者 王杰
出处 《知识产权》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第8期90-96,共7页 Intellectual Property
关键词 SOPA议案 制止侵权 公共政策 比例原则 SOPA prevention of infringements public policy principle of proportionality
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Laurance H. Tribe, the "Stop Online Privacy Act" (SOPA) Violates the First Amendment, http://www.net-coalition.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/tribe-legis-memo-on-SOPA- 12-6-11 - 1.pdf,最后访问日期:2012年3月5日.
  • 2Tamlin H. Bason, Right Holders and Lawmakers Spar with Google, Tech Industry over House' s SOPA Bill, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, Vol. 83, No. 2040, p 71.
  • 3H.R. 3261, "stop online piracy act" ( "SOPA" ) explanation of bill and summary of concerns, https://www.cdt.org/files/pdfs/NC-Analysis_of_HR3261_FINAL.pdf,最后访问日期:2012年3月1日.
  • 4Anandashankar Mazumdar, Amy Bivins, Introduction of House Online Piracy Legislation Set off Storm of Controversy, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, Vol. 83, No. 2038, p. 7.
  • 5What' s on the blacklist? Three sites that SOPA could put at risk, https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/whats -blacklist-three-sites-sopa-could-put-risk,最后访问日期:2012年3月3日.
  • 6The privatization of copyright lawmaking, http://torrentfreak.com/the-privatization-of-copyright-lawmaking -111112/,最后访问日期:2012年3月4日.
  • 7http://www.chillingeffects.org/.
  • 8Riley v. National Federation of Blind, Inc., 487 U.S. 781,789 (1988).
  • 9security and other technical concerns raised by the dns filtering requirement in the protect IP bill, http://www.redbarn.org/files_redbarn/ PROTECT-IP-Technical-Whitepaper-Final.pdf,最后访问日期:2012年3月5日.
  • 10Mark Lemley, David S. Levine, David G. Post, Don' t Break the Intemet, 64 Start. L. Rev. Online 34, http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/sites/ default/files/online/articles/64-SLRO-34_0.pdf,最后访问日期:2012年3月5日.

二级参考文献31

共引文献140

同被引文献29

  • 1冯晓青.网络环境下的著作权保护、限制及其利益平衡[J].社会科学,2006(11):96-103. 被引量:53
  • 2唐稷尧.知识产权犯罪:利益背景与刑事控制[J].中国刑事法杂志,2002(3):34-42. 被引量:30
  • 3[法]卢梭 何兆武译.《社会契约论》[M].商务印书馆,1980年.第26-29页,第9页,第16页.
  • 4[美]理查德·A·波斯纳 蒋兆康译.《法律的经济分析》[M].中国大百科全书出版社,1997年6月版.第717页.
  • 5[美]劳伦斯·莱斯格.《代码》,李旭等译,中信出版社2004年版,第164页.
  • 6Note, The Criminalization Of Copyright Infringement In The Digital Era, 112 Harv. L. Rev. 1705 (1999).
  • 7Glynn S. Lunney, Jr. ,Fair Use and Market Failure; Sony Revisited, 82 B. U. L. REV. 996(2002).
  • 8United States v. LaMacchia, 871F. Supp. 535, 536(D. Mass. 1994).
  • 9Note, The Criminalization of Copyright Infringement in the Digital Era, 112 Harv. L. Rev. 1706, 1722 (1999).
  • 10"台北地方法院""92年诉字2146号判决".

引证文献1

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部