期刊文献+

滑坡地区长输天然气管道失效危险的多级可拓评估 被引量:7

A multi-level extension evaluation on failure risk of long-distance gas pipeline in landslide area
原文传递
导出
摘要 依据影响滑坡稳定性的主要因素,结合评估管道失效危险性的主要指标,建立了滑坡地区长输天然气管道失效危险的多级评估指标体系。以可拓学为核心,结合层次分析法构造多级可拓评估模型,通过多级评估,获得不同子指标各自的危险性等级以及评价对象综合危险等级。选取陕西省枣树坪地区境内的某长输天然气管道开展实例验证,得到其在滑坡灾害下的失效危险性等级为3.18,更接近于"危险",且环境地质和气象水文的危险等级较高,应急响应的危险等级最低。多级可拓评估综合考虑了各级指标的关联度和权重影响,能够更加客观地反映评价对象的危险等级。 According to the main factors influencing on the landslide stability and combined with the main indexes for evaluating pipeline failure risks,this paper establishes a multi-level evaluation system for failure risks of long-distance gas pipeline in landslide area.Based on the extension theory,and combined with the analytic hierarchy process,it establishes a multi-level extension evaluation model,and obtains the risk class of different sub-indexes and provides a comprehensive risk class for evaluated objects.Taking a long-distance gas pipeline of West-to-East Gas Pipeline in Zaoshuping District,Shaanxi Province as a case,it obtains the failure risk class of the pipeline under landslide disaster is 3.18,closer to the 'Danger' class and the risk classes for environmental geology and meteorology and hydrology are high,but the emergency response risk class is the lowest.In the multi-level extension evaluation,the authors consider the influence of correlation and weight of indexes in different levels in comprehensive way,which can reflect the 'risk class' of evaluated objects in a more objective way.
出处 《油气储运》 CAS 2012年第8期564-568,647,共5页 Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
关键词 长输天然气管道 失效 滑坡 可拓 评估 long-distance gas pipeline,failure,landslide,extension,evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献51

共引文献242

同被引文献77

  • 1杨天鸿,解联库,王善勇,郑宏,芮勇勤,唐春安.抚顺西露天矿北帮边坡治理工程效果初步评价[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(11):1841-1846. 被引量:38
  • 2俞乐群.滑坡地区的管道建设[J].油气储运,1989,8(6):60-64. 被引量:5
  • 3王恭先.滑坡防治中的关键技术及其处理方法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(21):3818-3827. 被引量:158
  • 4李佩,杨伟.改进层次分析法和模糊灰色理论的管道土壤腐蚀评价[J].油气储运,2006,25(4):27-33. 被引量:27
  • 5叶学礼,章申远,任启瑞,等.GB50251-2003输气管道设计规范[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2003.
  • 6李华,徐震,杨水和,等.滑坡作用下的埋地管道强度失效分析[J].化工没备与管道,2012,49(6):54-57.
  • 7LIU P F, ZHENG J Y, ZHANG B J. Failure analysis of natural gas buried X65 steel pipeline under deflection load using finite element method[J]. Materials and Design, 2010, 31 (3): 1384-1391.
  • 8SURESH R D, SUDHIR K J. IITK-GSDMA 2007 Guidelines for seismic design of buried pipelines: Provisions with commentary and explanatory examples[S]. Kanpur: National Information Center of Earthquake, 2007.
  • 9American Lifelines Alliance. Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe[R/OL]. 2005-012-02[2013-05-23]. http://www. amerieanlifelinesalliance.corn/IMf/Update061305.pdf.
  • 10American Petroleum Institute. ANSI/API 5L-2007 Specification for line steel[S]. Washington D C: American Pipeline Institute, 2007.

引证文献7

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部