摘要
目的比较桡骨小头置换术与桡骨小头切除术治疗桡骨头骨折的临床效果。方法26例MasonII、III型桡骨小头骨折患者，其中桡骨小头置换术14例、桡骨小头切除术12例。结果26例平均随访16．5个月，依照Broberg和Morrey的肘关节评分标准，桡骨小头置换术优良率71．4％，桡骨小头切除术优良率50．0％，两组优良率差异有统计学意义（x2=4．98，P〈0．05）。结论桡骨小头置换可以获得更好的肘关节稳定性，治疗效果优于桡骨小头切除。
Objective To compare the clinical outcomes between radial head replacement and radial head resection for patients with radial head fractures. Methods 26 radial head fracture patients with type II and III ac- cording to Mason classification were treated. 14 eases were treated with radial head replacement, 12 cases were treated with radial head resection. Results All the 26 patients were followed up for 16.5 months in average, the excellent and good rate was 71.4% of the radial head replacement group, while the excellent and good rate was 50.0% of the radial head resection group in elbow joint score. The difference was statistically signifcant between the two groups （ X2 = 4.98, P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion Radial head replacement could achieve better stability of elbow joint than radial head resection.
出处
《中国基层医药》
CAS
2012年第18期2762-2763,共2页
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词
桡骨骨折
桡骨小头置换
桡骨小头切除
Radius fractures
Radial head replacement
Radial head resection
