期刊文献+

戊巴比妥钠对大鼠复合肌肉动作电位的影响 被引量:2

Effects of pentobarbital sodium on compound muscle action potentials in rats
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价戊巴比妥钠对大鼠复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)的影响。方法成年SD大鼠10只,雌、雄各半,8周龄,体重240~260g。腹腔注射1%戊巴比妥钠40mg/kg,给药后8min时开始刺激坐骨神经,记录其所支配的腓肠肌的CMAP,刺激强度为0.50、0.55、0.60V,每个刺激强度重复3次(刺激间隔1S),波宽0.05ms,频率10Hz。每隔5min重复上述刺激1次,分别为T1、T2、T3、T4、T5、T6、T7、T8、T9、T10。结果与T1时比较,0.50、0.55、0.60V强度下L3-5时CMAP峰值降低,0.50V强度下L3-6时CMAP潜伏期延长,0.55、0.60V强度下T4、5时CMAP潜伏期延长(P〈0.05或0.01)。结论戊巴比妥钠可抑制大鼠CMAP。 Objective To investigate the effects of pentobarbital sodium on compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) in rats. Methods Ten adult Sprague-Dawley rats (5 males, 5 females), aged 8 weeks, weighing 240-260 g, were anesthetized with intraperitoneal 1% pentobarbital sodium 40 mg/kg. The sciatic nerve was stimulated (intensity 0.50, 0.55 and 0.60 V, wave length 0.05 ms, frequency 10 Hz) starting from 8 min after administration. Each intensity was repeated three times at 1 s interval. The stimulation mentioned above was repeated every 5 min. CMAPs from the gastrocnemius muscle were recorded starting from 8 min after administration (T,) and then were recorded every 5 min for 9 times (T2-10) . Results The peak value of CMAP was significantly decreased at T3.s when the intensity was 0.50, 0. 55 and 0.60 V, and CMAP latency was significantly prolonged at T3-6 when the intensity was 0.50 V, and at T4.5 when the intensity was 0.55 and 0.60 V as compared with those at T1 ( P 〈 0.05 or 0. 01 ). Conclusion Pentobarbital sodium can inhibit CMAPs in rats.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期814-816,共3页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
基金 国家自然科学基金(30901404)
关键词 戊巴比妥 动作电位 肌电描记术 Pentobarbital Action potentials Electromyography
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献9

共引文献55

同被引文献21

  • 1刘秋菊,董为人,王元占,刘高望.实验动物麻醉期的呼吸障碍及处理[J].实验动物科学与管理,1995,12(3):42-44. 被引量:8
  • 2张逢辉,杨立伟,白世祥,国建飞.胸外科手术致腋神经损伤四例[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(12):906-906. 被引量:2
  • 3张栋.不同麻醉药对大鼠麻醉效果的比较[J].实验动物科学,2007,24(1):19-20. 被引量:28
  • 4Oroglu B, Turker T, Aktas S, et al. Effect of hyperbaric oxygen ther- apy on tense repair of the peripheral nerves [ J ]. Undersea Hyperb Med, 2011, 38(5):367-373.
  • 5Nijhuis TH, Smits ES, van Neck JW, et al. Ultrasound-guided nee- die positioning near the sciatic nerve to elicit compound muscle action potentials from the gastrocnemius muscle of the rat [ J ]. J Neurosci Methods, 2011, 194(2) :283-286.
  • 6Yan JG, Eldridge MP, Dzwierzynski WW, et al. Intraoperative elec- trophysio|ogical studies to predict the efficacy of neurolysis after nerve injury-experiment in rats [ J]. Hand (N Y), 2008, 3 (3) :257-262.
  • 7Cappelen-Smith C, Lin CS, Kuwabara S, et al. Conduction block during and after ischaemia in chronic inflammatory demyelinating t-olvneurooathv [ J ]. Brain. 2002. 125 ( Pt 8 ) - 1850-1858.
  • 8Atanassoff PG, Weiss BM, Brull SJ, et al. Compound motor action potential recording distinguishes differential onset of motor block of the obturator nerve in response to etidocaine or bupivacaine [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 1996, 82(2) :317-320.
  • 9EI-Kasaby AM, Atef HM, Helmy AM, et al. Cisatracurium in differ- ent doses versus atracurium during general anesthesia for abdominal surgery[Jl. Saudi JAaesth, 2010, 4(3) :152-157.
  • 10Correa CM, Sudo GZ, Sudo RT. Hemodynamic effects of atracurium and cisatracurium and the use of diphenhydramine and cimetidine [ J]. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2010, 60( 1 ) :52-63.

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部