农村居民环境卫生改善支付意愿及影响因素研究——以改厕为例被引量：47

导出

摘要本文从现代消费选择理论出发,建立改厕支付意愿模型,运用Logit模型、Tobit模型和江苏、陕西、山西3个省份的微观调研数据研究了我国农村居民的改厕支付意愿以及影响因素,试图从农村居民改厕支付意愿角度来解释我国政府财政投入改厕效果低的问题。本文的主要发现是:相对于当前的改厕成本,我国农村居民的改厕支付意愿较低,面临着较大的资金缺口。虽然东部省份的平均支付意愿高于中西部省份,但是西部省份比东部和中部省份有更高的改厕需求;农村居民改厕支付意愿的概率不仅仅是收入水平的体现,更重要的是知识、态度、个人卫生行为的体现,这些非经济变量对农村居民改厕支付意愿概率和数量都有非常显著的正向影响。

作者苗艳青杨振波周和宇

机构地区卫生部卫生发展研究中心联合国儿童基金会驻中国代表处国家发展改革委社会司

出处《管理世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第9期89-99,共11页 Journal of Management World

基金国家自然科学青年科学基金项目(批准号70903006) 国家发展和改革委和联合国儿童基金会的联合资助

关键词改厕需求支付意愿影响因素

分类号 X33 [环境科学与工程—环境工程]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献22

1Altaf, M. A. and Hughes, J. A., 1994, “Measuring the Demand for Improved Urban Sanitation Services: Results of a Contingent Valuation Study in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso”,Urban Studies, Vol.31, pp.l763-1776.
2Andreia C. Santos, Jennifer A. Roberts, Mauricio L. Barreto and Sandy Caimcross, 2011,“Demand for Sanitation in Salvador, Brazil: A Hybrid Choice Approach”,Social Science & Medicine, Vol.72, pp.l325-1332.
3Ben C. Arimah, 1996,“Willingness to Pay for Improved Environmental Sanitation in a Nigerian City”,Journal of Environmental Management, Vol.48,pp.127-138.
4John Briscoe, Paulo. Furtado de Castro, Griffen, C., North, J. and Olsen, 0.,1990, “Toward Equitable and Sustainable Rural Water Supplies: a Contingent Valuation Study in Bra-zil’’,The World, Bank Economic Review, Vol.4, pp.l 15-134.
5Clive L. Spash, 2006, “Non-Economic Motivation for Contingent Values: Rights and Attitudinal Beliefs in the Willingness to Pay for Environmental Improvements” , Land Economics, Vol.82, pp. 602-622.
6D. V. Raje, P. S. Dhobe and A. W. Deshpande, 2002, “Consumer,s Willingness to Pay More for Municipal Supplied Water: a Case Study”,Ecological Economics, Vol-42, pp.391-400.
7Hanemann, W. M. and Barbara Kanninen, 1998, The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-Response CV Data, University of California at Berkeley, Working Paper No. 798.
8Hines, J. M. Hungerford, H. R. and Tomera,A. N., 1986, “Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: a Meta-Analysis”,Journal of Environmental Education, Vol.18, pp.l-8.
9JamesF. Casey, James R. Kahn and Alexandre Rivas, 2006, “Willingness to Pay for Improved Water Service in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil” , Ecological Economics,Vol.58, pp.365-372.
10L.Venkatachalam, 2004, “The Contingent Valuation Method: a Review”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol.24, pp. 89-124.