期刊文献+

权力操作范式的分析与比较 被引量:27

The Analysis and Comparison of Power Manipulations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从认知的视角研究权力已是目前权力研究的主流,但权力的认知研究结果和外部效度均受制于其实验操作范式。对国外现有权力操作范式进行分析,可在促进其完善的同时,更对建构适合中国背景下的权力操作方式有一定的借鉴意义。从对现有主流权力操作范式,即奖惩法、回忆法、信息控制法、具体数值法、BATNA法、语义唤起等方法介绍,以及对其实证应用与检验结果中,可以明显对比出各种范式的优势与不足。现有学者较少意识到该点,使用各范式时不加区分,这引起了各范式在适用研究、多等级操作、相关概念操作等方面的混乱。未来研究仍需从角色分配、区分自我权力与他人权力操作、操作检验等角度,改进现有权力操作范式。 The cognitive researches of power are becoming more important than ever, while findings and validity of researches are still constrained by manipulations in experiments. Analysing the main trends of power manipulation abroad, which can not only promote the studying, but also benefit the construction of indigenous power manipulation. After introducing content in detail and comparing empirical results and application of main power manipulations synthetically, including Reward/Punishment, Recalling, Information Controlling, Figuring, Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA), Semantic Priming etc., obviously, all above have their own advantages, coupling with disadvantages which also ask for necessary consideration. Unfortunately, seldom schloars draw attention about these, leading to some confusion in terms of applicable researches for each paradigm, multi-hierarchy of power and differentiation with similar conceptions. After all, the future research tendencies, including the principles of assigning subject roles, differentiating the manipulation of one's own power from others' and manipulation checking, were discussed as well.
机构地区 苏州大学心理系
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期1507-1518,共12页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(70902056) 教育部人文社科项目(09YJCZH087)资助
关键词 权力 操作 测量 多水平研究 范式 power manipulation measurement multilevel research paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献56

  • 1韦庆旺,俞国良.权力的社会认知研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(6):1336-1343. 被引量:57
  • 2韦庆旺,郑全全,俞国良.权力、社会动机和问责对谈判知觉、行为和结果的影响[J].应用心理学,2010,16(1):27-34. 被引量:5
  • 3Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1362-1377.
  • 4Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80, 313-344.
  • 5Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power--sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.
  • 6Boksem, M. A. S., Smolders, R,, & De Cremer, D. (2009). Social power and approach-related neural activity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, doi: 10.1093/scan/ nsp006.
  • 7Carney, D. R., Hall, J. A., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29(2), 105-123.
  • 8Caza, B. B., Tiedens, L., & Lee, F. (2010). Power becomes you: The effects of implicit and explicit power on the self. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(1, 15-24.
  • 9Chen, S., Langner, C. A., & Mendoza-Denton, R. (2009). When dispositional and role power fit: Implications for self-expression and self-other congruence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 710-727.
  • 10Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 173-187.

二级参考文献59

  • 1韦庆旺.(2008).权力差异和社会动机对谈判行为和结果的影响.博士学位论文.浙江大学.
  • 2Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377.
  • 3Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.
  • 4Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462--479.
  • 5Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power-sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.
  • 6Berdahl, J. L., & Anderson, C. (2002). Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 497-509.
  • 7Carver, C. S., Sutton, $. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741-751.
  • 8Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 183-187.
  • 9Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-40.
  • 10Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory Control: A generative force behind power's far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502-508.

共引文献58

同被引文献472

引证文献27

二级引证文献147

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部