考虑消费者版权意识差异的信息产品定价策略被引量：11

The Pricing Strategy of Information Goods Considering the Consumer’s Copyright Consciousness

导出

摘要依据消费者的版权意识差异将消费者细分为伦理消费者和普通消费者,研究了信息产品垄断厂商的最优定价策略及其对艺术创作者的影响。研究表明:垄断厂商的最优定价因消费者结构、市场敏感性等因素而存在较大差异,没有一个固定的定价策略。高价策略可以得到伦理消费者的支持,但当存在盗版威胁时,垄断厂商因普通消费者的价格敏感特性而面临利润损失,单位可变成本越低,利润损失越大。此外,艺术创作者的期望定价要低于垄断厂商的最优定价,提高版权费率并不能保证给艺术创作者带来收益增加,双方存在定价协调问题。 Based on copyright consciousness difference,consumers are divided into ethical consumers and unethical consumers.The pricing strategy of information products monopolist and its impact on the creator are analyzed.The results show that the monopolists’ optimal pricing has a big difference because of consumer structure and market sensitivity,and there is no single fixed pricing strategy.High price strategy can win the support of the ethical consumer.But when there is a piracy threat,the monopolist may suffer loss of profits due to price sensitivity of general consumers,and the lower unit variable costs,the greater the loss of profits.In addition,creators’expected pricing should be lower than the monopolist’s optimal pricing.The improvement of copyright rate cannot guarantee increased revenue to the creator,so there is a need for pricing coordination.

作者张旭梅邓流生沈娜利陈伟

机构地区重庆大学经济与工商管理学院重庆大学现代物流重庆市重点实验室

出处《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第8期128-134,共7页 Management Review

基金国家自然科学基金项目(70871128) 国家863计划课题(2012AA040904)

关键词信息产品版权意识定价策略版权费 information goods copyright consciousness pricing strategy royalty

分类号 F713.5 [经济管理—市场营销] F204 [经济管理—国民经济] F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1Nascimento F., Vanhonacker W. R. Optimal Strategic Pricing of Reproducible Consumer Products[J]. Management Science, 1988,34(8): 921-937.
2Sundararajan A. Managing Digital Piracy: Pricing and Protection[J]. Information Systems Research, 2004,15(6):287-308.
3King S. P., Lampe R. Network Externalities, Price Discrimination and Profitable Piracy[J]. Information Economics and Policy, 2003,15 (3):271-290.
4Bhattacharjee S., Gopal R. D., Sanders G. L. Digital Music and Online Sharing: Software Piracy 2.0? [J]. Communications of the ACM, 2003,46(7):107-111.
5Wu S., Chen P. Versioning and Piracy Control for Digital Dnformation Goods[J]. Operations Research, 2008,56(1):157-172.
6张帆,蔡虹.软件盗版:公司的战略选择与政府政策的选择分析[J].管理工程学报,2005,19(4):91-95. 被引量：14
7Chen Y., Png I. Information Goods Pricing and Copyright Enforcement: Welfare Analysis[J]. Information Systems Research, 2003,14(1): 107-123.
8Gopal R. D., Sanders G. L. Global Software Piracy: You can't Get Blood out of a Turnip[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2000,43(9): 82-89.
9Clemons E. K., Gu B., Lang K. R. Newly Vulnerable Markets in an Age of Pure Information Products: An Analysis of Online Music and Online News[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2002,19(3): 17-41.
10Premkumar G. P. Alternate Distribution Strategies for Digital Music[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2003,46(9):95-110.

二级参考文献7

1泰勒尔.产业组织理论[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,1997.529.
2Takeyama L. The welfare implication of unauthorized reproduction of intellectual property in the presence of network externaltis[J]. Journal of industrial economics, 1994,62(2): 155 ～ 166.
3Cornner R K, Rumelt R P. Software piracy:an analysis of protection strategies[J]. Management scince, 1991,37(2): 125～139.
4Nascimento F, Vanhonacker W R. Optimal strategic pricing of reproducible consumer products [J]. Management scince, 1988,34 (8):921～937.
5Chen Y, Png I . Software Pricing and copyright: Against end-users[C].SSRN working paper series. I999.
6Cheng H K, Sims R R, Teegen H. To purchase or pirate softeware:an empiricl study [J]. Journal of management information systems, 1997,13(4):49～60.
7Shy O, Thisse J F. A strategic approach to software protection[J].Journal of economics and management strategy, 1999,8(2): 163～190.