期刊文献+

边际减排成本与限排影子成本、能源价格关系 被引量:2

Relationship among Marginal Abatement Cost,Emissions Constraints Shadow Cost and Energy Price
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章在梳理边际减排成本及相关研究的基础上,构建决定经济主体边际减排成本的理论模型,分析边际减排成本与排放约束影子成本、能源价格之间的相互关系和内在决定机制,论证边际减排成本与能源价格之间存在负向关系,并基于影子成本对边际减排成本影响因素进行图解分析;然后结合理论模型和国际碳交易均衡价格进行实证检验;最后立足中国提出相关政策建议。 This article analyzes the concept of marginal abatement cost and related research,constructs the marginal abatement cost decision model of economic entities,and analyzes the relationship among the marginal abatement cost,emissions constraints shadow cost and energy price.And this article analyzes the negative relationship between marginal abatement cost and energy price.Then,based on shadow cost,it analyzes the factors of marginal abatement cost by the graphic interpretation,and examines it empirically combined with theoretical model and the equilibrium price of the international carbon trading.Lastly,it puts forward some policy suggestions for China.
作者 张云 杨来科
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2012年第11期148-151,共4页 East China Economic Management
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC790289) 上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(12YS147) 上海市教委重点学科建设项目(J51703)
关键词 边际减排成本 影子成本 能源价格 marginal abatement cost shadow cost energy price
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Ellerman D A, Decaux A. Analysis of Post-Kyoto CO2 Emis- sion Trading Using Marginal Abatement Curves [R]. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. Re- portNO.40, 1998.
  • 2陈诗一.边际减排成本与中国环境税改革[J].中国社会科学,2011(3):85-100. 被引量:134
  • 3Klepper G, Sonja Peterson. Marginal Abatement Cost Curves in General Equilibrium:The Influence of World Energy Prices JR]. Working Paper 136, Kiel Institute for World Econom- ics, 2004.
  • 4Boehringer C, Loeschel A. Market Power in International Emission Trading: The Impacts of U.S. Withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol [R]. Discussion Paper 01-58, ZEW, Mannheim, 2001.
  • 5Blanchard O, P Criqui, A Kitous. After the Hague, Bonn and Marrakech: the future international market for emission per- mits and the issue of hot air[R]. Institute d' Economie et de Politique de 1' Energy, Paris, 2002.
  • 6Loesclael A, Zhang Z X. The Economic and Environmental Im- plications of the US Repudiation of the Kyoto Protocol and the Subsequent Deals in Bonn and Marrakech[R]. Centre for Euro- pean Economic Research of Mannheim University,2002.
  • 7Criqui P, Mima S, Viguir L. Marginal Abatement Cost of CO2 Emission Reductions, Geographical Flexibility and Concrete Ceilings: an Assessment using the POLES model [J]. Energy Policy, 1999, (27) :585 - 601.
  • 8张云,杨来科.国际碳排放权交易价格决定与最优出口规模研究[J].财贸经济,2011,32(7):70-77. 被引量:15
  • 9蔡圣华,牟敦国,方梦祥.二氧化碳强度减排目标下我国产业结构优化的驱动力研究[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(4):167-173. 被引量:27

二级参考文献46

共引文献172

同被引文献22

  • 1赵肖肖,唐湘博.区域大气污染防治特护期实施方案效果评估[J].环境科学与技术,2020(3):221-227. 被引量:8
  • 2Young A. Gold into Base Metals : Productivity growth in thePeople1 s Republic of China During the Reform Period [J].Journal of Political Economy, 1995,110(3):641-680.
  • 3Krugman P. The Myth of Asia’s Miracle [j]. Foreign Affairs,1994,73(6):62-78.
  • 4Wing I S. Explaining the Declining Energy Intensity of the USEconomy [J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2008, 30:21-49.
  • 5BirolF, Keppler J H. Prices,Technology Development and theRebound Effect[j]. Energy Policy,2000,28:457-469.
  • 6Aghion P, Howitt P. A Model of Growth through Creative De-struction [J]. Econometrica, 1992,60:323-351.
  • 7Fare R, Grosskoph S, Norris M, et al . Productivity Growth,Technical Progress and Efficiency Change in IndustrializedCountries[j]. American Economic Review, 1994,84: 66-83.
  • 8HansenB E. Threshold Effects in Non-Dynamic Panels:Esti-mation ,Testing, and Inference [J]. Journal of Econometrics,1999,93:345-368.
  • 9ChanK S . Trade, social values, and the generalized trust [j].Southern Economic Journal,2007,73(3) :733-753.
  • 10陈诗一.节能减排与中国工业的双赢发展:2009—2049[J].经济研究,2010,45(3):129-143. 被引量:368

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部