摘要
目的:通过对我科起搏器置入术后患者的观察和比较,有效护理干预与传统护理方法,对患者术后感染发生率的影响。方法:将我科收治的90例符合起搏器置入适应症的患者随机分为两组,一组患者实施护理干预,另一组患者则用传统方法护理。然后对两组患者的卧床时间、营养状况、住院天数及感染发生率进行比较。结果:实验组患者卧床时间和住院天数缩短,营养状况良好,感染发生率下降,而对照组患者则相反。结论:对患者实施有效的护理干预,不但能提高患者自身抵抗力,促进身体恢复,而且可以协助医生有效的预防发生起搏器术后感染,降低患者发生起搏器感染的发病率。
Objective：Through to our families pacemaker patients after placement of observation,comparing the nursing intervention and the traditional care method on the influence of patients postoperative infection rate.Methods：Our branch of 90 cases treated with pacemakers placement of the indications patients were randomly divided into two groups,one group is nursing intervention implementation,another one is the traditional method of nursing.Then comparing two groups in the bed time,nutrition condition,days in hospital and infection rate.Results：In the experiment group,the patients in hospital bed time and the days shorten,had good nutrition condition and low infection rate.But another one was reverse.Conclusion：The effective nursing intervention to the patients,not only can improve the patient’s resistance and promote the body to renew,but can help doctors to effectively prevent pacemaker postoperative infection,reduce the incidence of infections in patients with pacemakers.
出处
《中国医药导刊》
2012年第9期1643-1644,共2页
Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词
起搏器
护理干预
感染
Pacemaker； Nursing intervenetion； Infection
