混合研究方法的形成、研究设计与应用价值——对“第三种教育研究范式”的探析被引量：49

The Formation of Mixed Method,Research Design and Value of Application:An Analysis of the Third Paradigm of Educational Research

下载PDF

导出

摘要混合研究方法产生于质性和量化研究的激烈争论,目前已经成为"第三种教育研究范式"。量化、质性和混合研究三种研究方法具有各自的特点和优势,在实际运用中需要根据研究的问题来选择合适的研究方法。为了更好地认识混合研究方法,本文剖析了混合研究方法的类型和具体研究方案的设计,并用一个研究实例分析了"完全混合同时同等地位的设计方案",概述了教育研究中应用混合研究方法的目的和意义,思考了采用混合研究方法对我国教育研究领域的重要启示。 As a result from a fierce debate between qualitative research and quantitative research, mixed method has now become the ＂third paradigm of educational research＂. In practice, quantitative, qualitative and mixed research methods have ＇their own characteristics and advantages. It is depended on the specific research questions to decide which one is the appropriate research method. To better understand the mixed research method, this paper analyzes the types of mixed research methods and the specific research design programs. The paper also gives an example to explain the ＂fully mixed concurrent equal status designs＂. In the end, the paper overviews the purpose and meanings of application of mixed method in education field, in a bid to shed light on education research in China.

作者张绘

机构地区财政部财政科学研究所

出处《复旦教育论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期51-57,共7页 Fudan Education Forum

基金福特基金课题"中国城市民工子女义务教育经费供给保障政策研究"(编号:1075-0895) 国家留学基金委"2009年国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目"

关键词混合研究方法量化研究质性研究教育研究研究设计 Mixed Method Quantitative Research Qualitative Research Education Research Research Design

分类号 G40-034 [文化科学—教育学原理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1Strauss A L. Qualitative analysis for social scientists [M].CambridgeUniversity Press, 1999.
2McMillanJ H,Schumacher S. Research in education: Evidence 一based inquiry[M].Boston,MA: Pearson, 2006.
3CreswellJ W. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosingamong five traditions[M].Sage Publications Inc, 1998.
4PattonM Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods [M].SagePublications Inc, 2002.
50nwuegbuzieA J, Johnson R B. The validity issue in mixed research[J].Research in the Schools, 2006, 13(1): 48-63.
6蒋逸民.作为“第三次方法论运动”的混合方法研究[J].浙江社会科学,2009(10):27-37. 被引量：34
7JohnsonR B, Onwuegbuzie A J. Mixed methods research: A researchparadigm whose time has come[J].Educational Researcher, 2004, 33(7): 14.
8GorardS, Taylor C. Combining methods in educational and socialresearch[M].Open Univsity Press, 2004.
9TeddlieC, Tashakkori A. Major issues and controveries inthe use ofmixed methods in the social and behvioral sciences[J].Handbook ofmixed methods in social & behavioral research, 2003: 3-50.
10田虎伟.混合方法研究:美国教育研究中的新范式[J].高等教育研究,2006,27(11):74-78. 被引量：38

二级参考文献83

1田虎伟.混合方法研究:美国教育研究中的新范式[J].高等教育研究,2006,27(11):74-78. 被引量：38
2田虎伟.混和方法研究——美国教育研究方法的一种新范式[J].比较教育研究,2007,28(1):12-17. 被引量：36
3Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Huang, T. I. ( 1999 ). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93 ( 1 ), 48 - 62.
4Beebe, J. (2001). Rapid assessment process: An introduction. Walnut Creek, CA : AltaMira.
5Bhopal, K. (2000). Gender, "race" and power in the research process: South Asian women in East London. In C. Truman, D. M. Mertens, & B. Humphries (Eds.) , Research and inequality. London: UCL Press.
6Brewer, J. , & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
7Bryrnan, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London: Routledge.
8Campbell, D. T, & Fiske, D. W (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait - multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81 - 105.
9Caracelli, V J. , & Greene, J. C. (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed - method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 75 (2), 195 - 207.
10Caracelli, V J. , & Greene, J. C. (1997). Grafting mixed -method evaluation designs. In J. C. Greene & V J. Caracelli ( Eds. ), Advances in mixed - method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms ( pp. 19 - 32). San Francisco : Jossey - Bass.