期刊文献+

不同啤酒大麦品(系)种淀粉酶活性与蛋白质含量分析 被引量:4

Analysis of Amylase Activity and Protein Content Among Several Malting Barley Cultivars (Lines)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为选育啤酒大麦优良品种(系)提供适宜的亲本材料,经生态适应性、生产实用性选育后,对13种啤酒大麦品(系)种蛋白质含量、β-淀粉酶、α-淀粉酶活性进行检测分析。结果表明:不同大麦品种麦芽β-淀粉酶活性差异较大,‘沪麦16’的β-淀粉酶活性显著高于其他品种(P〈0.05),其次为A7-30、‘晋大麦(啤)2号’和09-189次之,‘驻3’、‘港啤1号’和‘邯98-58’的β-淀粉酶活性显著低于以上品种;‘晋大麦(啤)2号’、‘临啤3号’、W-03、‘驻9125’的籽粒蛋白均低于12%;09-189、A7-30、‘京984’及‘盐95137’的蛋白质含量在12%~12.5%,均显著低于其他5个品种(P〈0.05)。‘晋大麦(啤)2号’、09-189、A7-303个品种(系),其β-淀粉酶活性较高,且蛋白质含量低于12.5%,可作为选育优良啤酒大麦的材料。 In order to provide suitable parent materials α-amylase activity of 13 cuhivars were analyzed after for malting barley, protein content and β-amylase and they were subjected to selective breeding of ecological adaptability and production applicability. The results showed that, β-amylase activity varied where it was significantly higher in 'humai 16' than those in others (P〈0.05), then was A7-30 which was followed by 'Jin barley2', those in 09-189, 'Zhu3', 'Gangl' and 'Han 98-58' were statistically lower than above cuhivars (P〈0.05); grain protein content in 'Jin barely 2', 'Lin 3','W-03' and 'Zhu 9125' were less than 12%; those in 09-189, 'A7-30', 'Jing 984' and 'Yan 95137' were between 12% and 12.5% which were higher than the rest 5 cuhivals (P〈0.05). 'Jin barley 2', 09-189 and A7-30 were the suitable parent materials for breeding malting barley since the higherfl-amylase activity and than 12.5% grain protein content presented.
出处 《农学学报》 2012年第9期56-58,67,共4页 Journal of Agriculture
基金 山西省农业科学院育种工程项目"大麦新品种选育研究"(11YZGC060)
关键词 啤酒大麦 淀粉酶活性 蛋白质 Malting Barley Amylase Activity Protein
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1徐寿军,杨恒山,范富,王云,许如根,庄恒扬.大麦籽粒蛋白质含量预测模型[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(11):3863-3870. 被引量:4
  • 2陈锦新,戴飞,韦康,张国平.大麦籽粒β-淀粉酶活性的棱型效应和灌浆期间的动态研究[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2005,31(6):709-713. 被引量:3
  • 3赵春艳,曾亚文,普晓英,杨树明,杜娟.不同大麦品种(系)营养功能成分差异比较[J].西南农业学报,2010,23(3):613-618. 被引量:34
  • 4卢良恕.中国大麦学[M]北京:中国农业出版社,1995490.
  • 5Evans D E,Lance R C M,Eglinton J K. The influence of beta-amylase isoform pattern on beta-amylase activity in barley and malt[A].Royal Australian Chemical Institute,Melbourne,Vic,Australia,1995.357-364.
  • 6Swanston J S,Molina-Cano J L. Beta-amylase activity and thermostability in two mutants derived from the malting barley cv.triumph t[J].Journal of Cereal Science,2001,(33):155-161.
  • 7张新忠,汪军妹,黄祖六,朱靖环,贾巧君,林峰,杨建明.大麦α-淀粉酶的研究进展[J].大麦与谷类科学,2009,26(3):6-9. 被引量:7
  • 8Gibson T S,Solah V,Glennie-Holmes M R. Diastatic power in malted barley:contributions of malt parameters to its development and the potential of barley grain beta-amylase to predict malt diastatic power[J].Journal of the Institute of Brewing,1995,(20):63-70.
  • 9Arends A M,Fox D.P,Henry R J. Genetic and environmental variation in the diastatic power of Australian barley[J].Journal of Cereal Science,1995,(20):63-702.
  • 10Eagles H A,Beddggood A G,Panozzo J F. Cultivar and environmental effects on malting quality in barley[J].Australian Jourmal of Agricultural research,1995,(46):831-844.

二级参考文献58

共引文献70

同被引文献95

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部