结构性调整能否改善碳排放绩效?——来自中国省级面板数据的证据被引量：52

Can Structural Adjustments Improve Carbon Emissions Performance?

导出

摘要本文在全要素分析框架下较为精确地测算了2003～2010年我国30个省份的碳排放绩效,并运用面板数据计量模型估计了结构性调整对碳排放绩效的影响。结果发现:优化产业结构,深化产权制度改革,降低工业国有产权比重,合理引导资本流向,改善能源消费结构,对碳排放绩效具有重要意义;从碳排放绩效省际差距成因上看,禀赋结构对碳排放绩效省际差距平均解释度达到21.785%,能源结构达到20.229%,工业产权结构达到10.638%,产业结构达到2.986%。 The paper accurately evaluates carbon emission performance of China＇s 30 regions during 2003 ～ 2010. Moreover, it uses panel data econometric model to analyse the impact of structural adjustment to carbon emissions perform ance change. The results show that： to optimize the industrial structure, deepen reform of property rights, reduce the proportion of stateowned property of indus try, guide capital flows, optimize energy structure, to a certain extent, could im prove the performance of carbon emissions. In perspective of the causes of inter provincial gap of carbon emissions performance, the average interpretation of en dowment structure to the interprovincial gaps of carbon emissions performance is 21. 785%, that of the energy structure＇s average interpretation is 20. 2%, that of the ownership structureis 10. 6%, that of the industry structure is 3.0~.

作者查建平唐方方别念民

机构地区西南交通大学经济管理学院北京大学中国经济研究中心

出处《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第11期18-33,共16页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics

关键词结构性调整碳排放绩效贡献度 Structural Adjustment Carbon Emissions Performance Contribu tion

分类号 F124.6 [经济管理—世界经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献30

1Ang B. W. , Zhang F. Q. , 2000, A Survey of Index Decomposition Analysis in Energy and Envi- ronmental Studies [J], Energy, 12, 1149-1176.
2Chung Y. H. , Fare S. , Grosskopf, 1997, Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach [J], Journal of Environmental Management, 3, 229 - 240.
3Fare S. , Grosskopf, 2007, Environmental Production Functions and Environmental Directional Distance Functions [J], Energy, 32, 1055-1066.
4Fan Ying, Liu Lan Cui, Wu Gang, Hsien Tang Tsai, Wei Yi Ming, 2007, Changes in Carbon In- tensity in China: Empirical Findings from 1980-2003 [J], Ecological Economics, 62, 683- 691.
5IPCC, 2006, IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Volume [I [EB/OL], Http: //www. Ipcc. ch/ipccreports/Methodo-logy-reports, htm.
6Kaneko S., Fujii H., Sawazu N., Fu]ikura R. , 2010, FinancialAllocation Strategy f or theRe-gional Pollution Abatemant Cost of Reducing Sulfur Dioxide Emissions in the Thermal Power Sector in Chi- na [J], Energy Policy, 5, 2131-2141.
7Michio Watanabe, Katsuya Tanaka- 2007, Efficiency Analysis of Chinese Industry : A Directional Distance Function Approach [J], Energy Policy, 35, 6323-6331.
8Shorrocks, Anthony F. , 1982, Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components [J] , Econometrica, 50, 193-211.
9Ramanathan R. , 2002, Combining Indicators of Energy Consumption and COz Emissions: A Cross- country Comparison [J]. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 3, 321-329.
10William A. , BroCk M. , Scott Taylor, 2004. The Green Solow Model ER-, NBER Working Pa- pers 10557, National Bureau of Economic Research.