期刊文献+

硬膜外预充生理盐水预防剖宫产术患者硬膜外置管诱发血管损伤的适宜剂量 被引量:16

Optimum dose of normal saline for preloading epidural space required to prevent injury to blood vessel by epidural catheter placement for caesarean section
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨硬膜外预充生理盐水预防剖宫产术患者硬膜外置管诱发血管损伤的适宜剂量。方法单胎足月妊娠拟在硬膜外麻醉下行子宫下段剖宫产术的患者200例,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,年龄24~35岁,体重63~78k只。采用随机数字表法,将患者随机分为4组(n=50):Ⅰ组~Ⅳ组。硬膜外穿刺成功后,Ⅰ组直接置入硬膜外导管,Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组和Ⅳ组分别通过硬膜外针注射0.9%生理盐水2、5和10ml,注射完后保持注射器压缩针栓20s,使预充液充分扩散,然后置入硬膜外导管。注入1.5%利多卡因3ml,排除脊麻征象后,按需分次追加0.75%罗哌卡因10~20ml。于麻醉前(Tn)、硬膜外腔给药完毕后10min(T1)、20min(L)和手术结束时(L)记录MAP和HR;记录硬膜外穿刺针针尾见淡红色血水、硬膜外导管回抽见淡红色血水、硬膜外导管置入血管、拔出硬膜外导管见尾端有暗红色血液的发生情况及罗哌卡因用量;于T2时测定麻醉平面上界,并采用改良的Bromage分级评定双侧运动阻滞情况。结果4组血液动力学指标均波动在正常范围。与工组、Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组比较,Ⅳ组T2时MAP降低,麻醉平面上界升高,Bromage分级降低(P〈0.05),Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组间MAP差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。4组间HR和罗哌卡因用量比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。与Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组比较,Ⅲ组和Ⅳ组硬膜外穿刺针针尾见淡红色血水的发生率、硬膜外导管回抽出淡红色血水的发生率和硬膜外导管见尾端有暗红色血液的发生率降低(P〈0.05)。结论硬膜外预充5ml,生理盐水既能有效预防剖宫产术患者硬膜外置管诱发血管损伤,又不影响麻醉效果,是适宜剂量。 [Abstract] Objective To determine the optimum dose of normal saline (NS) for preloading epidural space required to prevent the injury to blood vessel by epidural catheter placement for caesarean section. Methods Two hundred ASA I or lI parturients with a single baby at full term in vertex presentation, aged 24-35 yr, weighing 63-78 kg, scheduled for caesarean section under continuous epidural anesthesia, were randomly divided into 4 groups ( n = 50 each) : control group (group I ), NS 2 ml group (group ]I ), NS 5 ml group (group m ) and NS 10 ml group (group iV ). The epidural puncture was performed at L2_3 interspace with a Tuohy needle at- tached to a 5 ml syringe. Loss of resistance was used to identify the epidural space. In group C no fluid was inject- ed into the epidural space before insertion of the catheter, while in groups lI , I[ and iV NS 2, 5 and 10 ml were injected into the epidural space before the catheter insertion respectively. After a test dose of 3 ml 1.5% lido- caine, 0.75% ropivacaine 10-20 ml was administered through the epidural catheter. MAP and HR were recorded before epidural puncture (TO ), at 10 and 20 min after the end of epidural administration (T,.2), and at the end of surgery (%). The number of patients in whom blood or blood tinted fluid was withdrawn from the epidural catheter was recorded. The amount of ropivacaine consumed was recorded. The upper level of anesthesia was measured by pin-prick and the degree of motor block was assessed using modified Bromage scale at T2 . Results The hemody- namic parameters were in the normal range in the four groups. MAP was significantlY lower at T2, the upper level of anesthesia was significantly higher, and the degree of motor block was significtmtly smaller in group Ⅳ than in groups Ⅰ , Ⅱ and Ⅲ ( P 〈 0.05 ) . There was no significant difference in MAP among groups Ⅰ , Ⅱ and Ⅲ ( P 〉 0.05). There was no significant difference in HR and the amount of "ropivacaine consumed among the four groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). The number of patients in whom blood or blood tinted fluid was withdrawn from epidural cath- eter was significantly smaller in groups Ⅲ and Ⅳ compared with groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ(P 〈0.05). Conclusion Preloading the epidural space with NS 5 ml can prevent the occurrence of injury to blood vessel induced by insertion of epidural catheter with no influence on the efficacy of aneathesia and NS 5 ml is the optimum dose.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第8期929-932,共4页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
关键词 氯化钠 注射 硬膜外 血肿 硬膜外 脊髓 剖宫产术 Sodium chloride Injections, epidural Hematoma, epidurat, spinal Cesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1韩传宝,周钦海,钱燕宁,张国楼.提高硬脊膜外腔阻滞安全性的操作体会[J].上海医学,2010,33(10):957-958. 被引量:8
  • 2Cesur M, Alici HA, Erdem AF, et al. Administration of local anes- thetic through the epidural needle before catheter insertion improves the quality of anesthesia and reduces catheter-related complications. Anesth Analg,2005,101 (5) : 1501-1505.
  • 3Mhyre JM, Greenfield ML, Tsen LC, et al. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials that evaluate strategies to avoid epidural vein cannulation during obstetric epidural catheter placement. Anesth Analg,2009,108(4) : 1232-1242.
  • 4Harney D, Moran CA, Whitty R, et al. Influence of posture on the incidence of vein cannulation during epidural catheter placement. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2005,22 (2) : 103-106.
  • 5韩传宝,于力,周钦海,丁正年,钱燕宁.硬膜外预充生理盐水对置管诱发剖宫产术患者硬膜外血管损伤的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2010,30(10):1186-1188. 被引量:13

二级参考文献14

  • 1徐世元.局麻药辅用肾上腺素与周围神经毒性[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2006,27(5):290-292. 被引量:10
  • 2Mhyre JM, Greenfield ML, Tsen LC, et al. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials that evaluate strategies to avoid epidural vein cannulation during obstetric epidural catheter placement. Anesth Analg, 2009,108 : 1232-1242.
  • 3Harney D, Moran CA, Whitty R, et al. Influence of posture on the incidence of vein cannulation during epidural catheter placement. Eur J Anaesthcsiol, 2005,22 (2) : 103-106.
  • 4Neal JM. Effects of epinephrine in local anesthetics on the central and peripheral nervous systems: neurotoxiclty and neural blood flow. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2003,28(2):124-134.
  • 5Barash P G,Cullen B F,Stoelting R K.床麻醉学.王伟鹏,李立环,主译.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:612-613.
  • 6Hughes S C,Levinson G,Rosen M A.施奈德与莱文森产科麻醉学.张友忠,荣风年,主译.第4版.山东:科学技术出版社,2005:376-456.
  • 7Reed A P,Yudkowita F S.临床麻醉病例.李文志,曾因明,主译.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2008:335-345.
  • 8修培宏,田新民,马卫东.临床麻醉风险与并发症.北京:中国医药科技出版社,2007:461-485.
  • 9Hines R I,Rathmell J P,Neal J M.局部麻醉学.黄文起,主译.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008;91-94.
  • 10缪勇,臧广州.最新麻醉技术操作规范与新技术应用实用手册.天津:电子出版社,2004;384-385.

共引文献17

同被引文献92

  • 1阮祥才,佘守章,许立新,董源洪.三种椎管内麻醉在70岁以上患者人工关节置换术中应用的比较[J].中华老年医学杂志,2005,24(10):749-752. 被引量:22
  • 2吴敏仙,唐新龙.剖宫产术病人左旋布比卡因、罗哌卡因及布比卡因硬膜外麻醉的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(2):176-177. 被引量:20
  • 3徐启明 李文硕.临床麻醉学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.39-40.
  • 4Tita ATN, Landon MB elective repeal cesarean , Spong CY, et al.Timing of delivery at term and neonatal outcomes[J].New England Journal of Medicine,2009, 360 (2): 111-120.
  • 5Bauer ME, Kountanis JA, Tsen LC, et al.Risk factors for failed conversion of labor epidural analgesia to cesarean delivery anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational trials[J]. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia,2012,21 ( 4 ): 294-309.
  • 6Gambling D, Berkowitz J, Farrell TR, et al.A randomized controlled comparison of epidural analgesia and combined spinal-epidural analgesia in a private practice setting: pain scores during first and second stages of labor and at delivery[J].Anesthesia & Analgesia,2013,116 ( 3 ) 636-643.
  • 7Wang C, Slikker W. Strategies and experimental models for evaluating anesthetics: effects on the developing nervous system[J]. Anesth Analg, 2008, 106(6): 1643-1658.
  • 8Miller RD, Miller's Anesthesia [M]. 7th ed. New York: Churchill livingstone, 2010: 769-824.
  • 9Leo S, Sng BL, Lim Y, et al. A randomized comparison of low doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery[J]. Anesth Analg, 2009, 109(5): 1600-1605.
  • 10于布为,刘进,吴新民’等.中国麻醉学指南与专家共识[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:119-126.

引证文献16

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部