同级评价对个体创新意愿影响的实验研究被引量：5

An Experimental Study on the Effect of Peer Evaluation in Individual Innovative Intention

下载PDF

导出

摘要采用两因素组间实验设计与情境法,设计四种模式的同级评价情境,探讨同级评价模式对员工个体创新意愿的影响。方差分析的结果表明:同级评价导向和评价性质的交互作用显著,当同级依据结果进行评价时,负面评价比正面评价更有助于激发个体创新;当同级给予正面评价时,过程导向的评价比结果导向的评价更有助于激发个体创新努力。 This paper adopted 2 ~ 2 （evaluation property and evaluation orientation） two factors between subjects design, with four kinds of evaluation settings, and then analyzes the impact of peer evaluation on the individual innovative tendency. Result showed that the interaction of type of evaluation property and evaluation orientation were significant. When colleague evaluation was based on individual outcome, the negative evaluation would be more effective to promote individual creative motivation. When colleague used negative evaluation, evaluation based on individual outcome would be more effective to in- dividual creative motivation than based on individual process effort.

作者宝贡敏蔡丽玲

机构地区浙江大学管理学院浙江理工大学服装学院

出处《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第10期86-88,112,共4页 Soft Science

基金国家自然科学基金面上项目(70971117) 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(0902061-B)

关键词同级评价个体创新意愿评价导向评价性质评价模式 peer evaluation individual innovative tendency evaluation property evaluation orientation evaluation model

分类号 G305 [文化科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1Oldham G R,Cummings A.Employee Creativity:Perso-nal andContextual Factors at work[J].Academy of Manage-ment Journal.1996(39):607-634.
2Amabile T M,Gryskiewicz N D.The Creative Environ-ment Scale:Work Environment Inventory[J].Creativity Resea-rch Journal.1989(2):231-253.
3Amabile T M,Conti R,Coon H,Lazenby J,Herron M.Assessingthe Work Environment for Creativity[J].Academy of ManagementJournal.1996(9):1154-1184.
4Choi J N.Individual and Contextual Predictors of creative pe-rfor-mance:the Mediating Role of psychological Processes[J].Creativi-ty Research Journal,2004,16(2-3):187-199.
5Earley P C.An examination of the Mechanisms Underlying the Rela-tion of Feedback to Performance[J].Academy of Man-agement of Proceedings,1986:214-218.
6Shu-Chen Y and Cheng-Kiang F.Social Capital,Behaviouralcontrol and Tacit Knowledge Sharing-A multi-informant desi-gn[J].International Journal of Information Management,2009,(29):210–218.
7Erez A et al.Effects of rotated Leadership and Peer Evaluation on theFunctioning and Effectiveness of self-managed Teams:A quasi-ex-periment[J].Personnel Psychology,2002,55(4):929-948.
8Nease A A,Musgett B O,Quinones M A.Relationships among Feed-back sign,self-efficacy and Acceptance of performance Fee-dback[J].Journal of Applied Psychology 1999,84(5):806-814.
9Martin L L,Ward D W,Achee J W,Wyer R S Jr.Mood as input:People Have to interpret the Motivational Imp-lycations of theirMoods[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1993(64):317–326.
10Vinarski-Peretz H,Carmeli A.Linking Care Felt to Enga-ge-ment in Innovative Behaviors in the Workplace:The Me-diatingRole of Psychological Conditions[J].Psychology of Aesthetics Cre-ativity and the Arts,2011,5(1):43-53.