摘要
目的比较持续加温湿化法及定时气道湿化法在喉癌气管切开术后的应用效果。方法将120例喉癌气管切开术后患者,随机分为对照组和观察组,各60例。对照组采用定时气道湿化法进行气道护理。观察组采用微量泵持续加温湿化法护理。并观察两组湿化效果及疗效。结果观察组湿化效果满意率显著高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组形成痰痂、气道出血、肺部感染发生率及日吸痰次数显著少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论相对于传统的定时气道湿化法,持续加温湿化法进行气道护理,可显著减少喉癌气管切开术后并发症,改善患者预后。
Objective Compare the effect of continuous heating humidification with interval ordinary humidification in the laryngeal carcinoma patients with traeheotomy. Methods 120 laryngeal carcinoma patients with tracheotomy were randomly divided into control group and experience group with 60 patients each group. Control group were given interval ordinary humidification of airway and experience group received continuous heating humidification of airway. Results Satisfaction rate of humidification effect in experience group was much higher than that in control group （90. 0% vs 63. 3%, P（ 0. 05） ; Formation of phlegm callus, trachea hemorrhage, pulmonary infection and the mean number of days suction in experience group weremuch lower than that in the control group （P〈0. 05）. Conclusions Comparison with interval ordinary humidification of airway, continuous heating humidification of airway for the laryngeal carcinoma patients with traeheotomy greatly decreases the occurrence of complications and improve prognosis.
出处
《临床护理杂志》
2012年第5期64-66,共3页
Journal of Clinical Nursing
关键词
喉肿瘤
气管切开术
湿化法
laryngeal neoplasms
tracheotomy
wet method
