期刊文献+

白芍总苷联合曲安奈德局部注射治疗口腔扁平苔藓疗效评价 被引量:19

Clinical evaluation of total glucosides of paeony combined with intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection for oral lichen planus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价白芍总苷联合曲安奈德局部注射治疗口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)的临床疗效。方法选择2010年8月至2011年8月就诊于深圳市人民医院口腔医学中心口腔黏膜病专科门诊的充血糜烂型和溃疡型OLP患者58例,随机分为试验组和对照组(各29例)。分别采用白芍总苷联合曲安奈德(试验组)及单纯使用曲安奈德(对照组)治疗,同时采用视觉类比量表(VAS)和REU评分量表进行症状和体征记分,评价治疗后1个月和3个月的疗效。结果治疗后1个月复诊,试验组总有效率为82.8%(24/29),对照组总有效率为79.3%(23/29),两组差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.112,P>0.05);治疗后3个月复诊,试验组总有效率为86.2%(25/29),对照组总有效率为51.7%(15/29),两组差异有统计学意义(χ2=15.241,P<0.01)。结论白芍总苷联合曲安奈德可有效治疗OLP,白芍总苷可做为联合用药和病程缓解期的合理选择。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of total glucosides of paeony combined with intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection for oral lichen planus ( OLP ) . Methods Totally 58 patients with clinically confirmed erosive and ulcerative OLP were randomly divided into two groups , treated with total glucosides of paeony+triamcinolone acetonide and triamcinolone acetonide respectively ; meanwhile , the VAS and REU scoring system was utilized to compare the signs and symptoms. Results The effectiveness rate of the treatment group was 82.8% ( 24/29 ), the control group 79.3% ( 23/29 ), showing that there was no statistical significance of effectiveness rate between them ( χ 2 = 0.112 , P 0.05 ) at the first month. The effectiveness rate of the treatment group was 86.2% ( 25/29 ), the control group 51.7% ( 15/29 ), showing that there was statistical significance of effectiveness rate between them ( χ 2 = 15.241 ,P 0.01 ) at the third month. Conclusion Total glucosides of paeony combined with intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection is effective and safe in the treatment of OLP.
出处 《中国实用口腔科杂志》 CAS 2012年第10期617-619,622,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词 白芍总苷 曲安奈德 口腔扁平苔藓 total glucosides of paeony triamcinolone acetonide oral lichen planus
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Farhi D,Dupin N. Pathophysiology,etiologic factors,and clinicalmanagement of oral lichen planus, part I: facts and controver-sies [J]. Clin Dematol,2010,28(l) :100-108.
  • 2Piboonniyom SO,Treister N,Pitiphat W,et al. Scoring system formonitoring oral lichennoid lesions: a preliminary study [J]. OralSurg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2005,99(6):696-703.
  • 3周刚,刘宏伟,林梅,唐国瑶.口腔扁平苔藓(萎缩型、糜烂型)疗效评价标准(试行)[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2005,40(2):92-93. 被引量:371
  • 4Crincoli V,Di Biscegie MB,Scivetti M,et al. Oral lichen planus:update on etiopathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment [J]. Immu-nopharmacol Immunotoxicol,2011,33(1) : 11-20.
  • 5Malhotra AK, Khaitan BK, Sethuraman G, et al. Betamethasoneoral mini-pulse therapy compared with topical triamcinolone ace-tonide ( 0.1 % ) paste in oral lichen planus : A randomized compara-tive study [J]. J Am Acad Dermatol,2008,58(4):596-602.
  • 6肖堃.白芍总苷在自身免疫性疾病中的应用[J].中华临床免疫和变态反应杂志,2008,2(1):55-60. 被引量:32
  • 7尚书,顾晶晶,唐国瑶.白芍总苷治疗口腔扁平苔藓的疗效评价研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2007,23(4):238-240. 被引量:22
  • 8Xia J,Li CY,Hong Y,et al. Short-term clinical evaluation of in*tralesional triamacinolone acetonide injection for ulcerative orallichen planus [j]. J Oral Pathol Med,2006,35(6) :327-331.
  • 9史宗道.口腔临床药物学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.
  • 10周刚,樊明文,刘君炎.糖皮质激素对口腔扁平苔藓辅助性T细胞平衡的影响[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2005,40(2):98-101. 被引量:23

二级参考文献75

共引文献431

同被引文献111

二级引证文献115

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部