期刊文献+

标准大骨瓣开颅术治疗大面积脑梗死的临床研究 被引量:8

Clinical study on standard large trauma craniotomy for treating a large area of cerebral infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨标准大骨瓣开颅去大骨瓣减压术与大骨瓣开颅去大骨瓣常规减压术对治疗大面积脑梗死的效果。方法将60例大面积脑梗死患者(脑梗死面积>4cm)随机分成研究组(标准大骨瓣开颅)和对照组(常规大骨瓣开颅),在治疗前后对全部患者均进行GCS评分、头颅CT检查并测量脑梗死灶范围和中线结构移位,TCD监测脑血流情况。根据两组的治疗结果比较其疗效。结果术后7d研究组较对照组的GCS评分、脑梗死范围和中线结构移位有显著性差异(P<0.05);脑血流明显改善。14d后研究组的各项指标接近正常。研究组死亡率为3.33%,对照组为16.6%。结论标准大骨瓣开颅去大骨瓣减压术治疗大面积脑梗死伴天幕裂孔疝能减少并发症,降低死亡率,是手术治疗大面积脑梗死的有效方法。 Objective To investigate the effects of standard large trauma craniotomy (standard large craniotomy) to go hemicraniectomy craniotomy to large trauma conventional decompression for the treatment of massive cerebral infarction. Methods Totally 60 cases of patients with massive cerebral infarction (infarct area 〉 4cm) were randomly divided into study group (standard craniotomy) and control group (conventional craniotomy), before and after treatment, all patients were GCS score, cranial CT examination and measurement of cerebral infarction stove range and midline structures shift, TCD monitoring of cerebral blood flow. According to the treatment results of the two groups to compare their efficacy. Re-suits GCS score of 7 d after the study group than that in the control group, cerebral infarction scope and midline shift significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ) ; cerebral blood flow was significantly improved. After 14 days of the Study Group of the indicators to be near normal. The study group mortality rate was 3.33%, and 16. 6% in the control group. Conclusions The standard large trauma craniotomy to hemicraniectomy treatment of large cerebral infarction with canopy hiatal hernia can reduce complications and mortality, is an effective method for the surgical treatment of massive cerebral infarction.
出处 《医药论坛杂志》 2012年第11期24-26,共3页 Journal of Medical Forum
关键词 大面积脑梗塞 标准大骨瓣开颅术 临床效果 A large area of cerebral infarction Standard large trauma craniotomy Clinical effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1刘敬民.张珊“大面积脑梗死”[J].中国实用医药杂志,2011,19(11):677.
  • 2陈泽杉.标准大骨瓣减压术治疗大面积脑梗死30例临床分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2010,11(6):384.
  • 3Carter BS, Ogilvy CS, Candia GJ, et al. One - year outcome after decompressive surgery for massive nondominant hemispheric in- farction [ J ]. Neurosurgery,2011,40 ( 6 ) : 1168-1175.
  • 4邢永国,孟伟英.标准大骨瓣减压术的临床应用[J].中国医药导报,2008,5(30):51-52. 被引量:5
  • 5江基尧,李维平,徐蔚,许文辉,黄强,朱诚,王宇,罗其中.标准外伤大骨瓣与常规骨瓣治疗重型颅脑损伤多中心前瞻性临床对照研究[J].中华神经外科杂志,2004,20(1):37-40. 被引量:526
  • 6Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Ahn ES, et al. Outcome following deeompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury[J].J Neurosurg,2010,104(4) :469-479.
  • 7刘勇.38例重型颅脑损伤合并脑疝患者行小脑幕切开术的临床观察[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2010,15(5):42-43.
  • 8Wagner S, Schnippefing H, Asehoff A, et al. Saboptimun hemi- cranieetomy as a cause of additional cerebral lesions in patients with malignant infarction oflhemiddle cerebral artery [ J ]. J Neu- rosurg,2011,94 ( 5 ) : 693-696.
  • 9曹春光,崔传新,谢方民,等.幕上大面积脑梗塞伴脑疝的外科治疗[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2010,12(8):477-479.

二级参考文献14

  • 1江基尧.介绍一种国外常用颅脑损伤标准大骨瓣[J].中华神经外科杂志,1998,14(6):381.
  • 2江基尧.介绍一种国外临床常用的标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术.中华神经外科杂志,1998,14(7):381-381.
  • 3刘连松.标准外伤大骨瓣减压术救治重型颅脑损伤126例体会[J].中国现代医生,2007,45(09X):54-54. 被引量:2
  • 4Guerra WKW;Gaab MR;Dietz H.Surgical decompression for traumatic brain swelling:indications and results[J],1999.
  • 5Jiang JY;Gao GY;LI WP.Early indicators of prognosis in 846 cases of severe traumatic brain injury[J],2002(7).
  • 6Chesnut RM;Ghajar J;Maas Al.Early indicators of prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury[J],2000.
  • 7Miller JD;Becker DP;Ward JD.Significance of intracranial hypertensi on in severe head injury[J],1977.
  • 8GOWER DJ;Lee KS;McWhorter JM.The role of subtemporal decompression in severe closed head injury[J],1988.
  • 9Shigemori M;Syojima K;Nakayama K.Outcome of acute subdural hamatoma following decompressive hemicraniectomy,1979(Suppl).
  • 10Venes JL;Collins WF.Bifrontal decrompressive craniectomy in the management of head trauma[J],1975.

共引文献527

同被引文献50

引证文献8

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部