期刊文献+

胚胎期及哺乳期全氟辛烷磺酸盐(PFOS)暴露对大鼠长时程突触可塑性影响的miRNA组学研究 被引量:5

Effect of Prenatal and Neonatal Exposure to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate(PFOS) on Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Rat by MiRNA Microarray
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探讨PFOS胚胎期及哺乳期暴露对动物子代学习记忆能力影响的分子机理,采用微小RNA(miRNA)芯片技术检测PFOS胚胎期及哺乳期暴露对出生第1和7天大鼠脑组织miRNA表达的影响,分析突触可塑性相关miRNA表达的差异变化。结果显示,经PFOS暴露后出生第1和7天的大鼠脑组织中分别有24和17个miRNA发生显著性差异表达(p<0.05),其中与突触传递和神经递质转运等相关的miRNA的差异表达最为显著,主要包括miR-466b、miR-672、miR-297、miR-674-3p和miR-207。差异表达miRNA的路径分析显示出生后1和7d的大鼠的长时程增强效应(LTP)均受PFOS显著影响(p<0.05),这说明PFOS胚胎期及哺乳期暴露可能通过影响LTP的形成、发展和维持过程对大鼠子代大脑学习记忆能力造成威胁,并且miR-466b、miR-672、miR-297、miR-674-3p和miR-207可能参与了其中的调控过程。 To explore the molecular mechanism underlying the toxic effect of PFOS prenatal and neonatal ex- posure on the study and memory ability of offspring, miRNA arrays were used to profde the expression of brain miRNAs in neonatal rats on postnatal day (PND) 1 and 7 with prenatal and neonatal exposure of PFOS. The results showed that twenty-four brain miRNAs on PND 1 and seventeen on PND 7 rats were significantly changed after PFOS exposure (p 〈 0.05). miR-466b, miR-672, miR-297, miR-674-3p and miR-207, which partici- pate in neurotransmitter transport and synaptic transmission, showed the highest differential expression. The analysis of pathways associated with differentially expressed miRNAs indicated that long-term potentiation (LTP) in rat pups on PND 1 and 7 rats were significantly affected by PFOS exposure (p 〈 0.05). It is demon- strated that prenatal and neonatal exposure of PFOS could threaten the study and memory ability of rat off- spring through the effect of the formation, maturation and maintenance of LTP. Moreover, miR-466b, miR-672, miR-297, miR-674-3p and miR-207 might be involved in the above process.
出处 《生态毒理学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期491-500,共10页 Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(21177020 20837004)
关键词 全氟辛烷磺酸盐 长时程增强效应 MIRNA芯片 突触可塑性 perfluorooctane sulfonate LTP miRNA microarray synaptic plasticity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献52

  • 1[1]Bartel DP.Cell,2004,116(2):281-297.
  • 2[2]Xie X,Lu J,Kulbokas E J,et al.Nature,2005,434(7031):338-345.
  • 3[3]Lewis BP,Burge CB,Bartel DP.Cell,2005,120 (1):15-20.
  • 4[4]Lee Y,Jeon K,Lee JT,et al.EMBO J,2002,21 (17):4663-4670.
  • 5[5]Yi R,Qin Y,Macara IG,et al.Gene Dev,2003,17(24):3011-3016.
  • 6[6]Yu B,Yang Z,Li J,et al.Science,2005,307(5711):932-935.
  • 7[7]Hutvágner G,Zamore PD.Science,2002,297 (5589):2056-2060.
  • 8[8]Olsen PH,Ambros V.Dev Biol,1999,216(2):671-680.
  • 9[9]Carmell MA,Xuan Z,Zhang MQ,et al.Genes Dev,2002,16 (21):2733-2742.
  • 10[10]Ma JB,Ye K,Patel DJ.Nature,2004,429(6989):318-322.

共引文献18

同被引文献77

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部