摘要
法庭会话是一个语言博弈的动态过程,法庭话语标记语all right作为言语交际活动的载体,体现了庭审参与者之间的语言博弈,具有肯定、重述、话轮转换、打断和缓和面子威胁的元语用功能。而且,不同庭审参与人对这五种元语用功能的使用侧重不同,这种差异反映出话语人的法庭角色和会话目的不同以及机构权力分配的不对称性。
As the courtroom dialogue is a dynamic process involving language games, the discourse marker all right used in the courtroom dialogue shows the dynamic language game between court participants, and embraces five meta-pragmatic functions ： affirmation, restatement, turn-taking clues, interruption and the alleviation of face threats. Moreover, different court participants can differ in their respective utilization of the five meta-pragmatic functions, which is reflective of the dissimilarities in the court roles and conversational purposes of court speakers and the asymmetry of institutional power distribution.
出处
《海南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
2012年第7期92-96,共5页
Journal of Hainan Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金
广东医学院2010年科研基金资助项目"法律修辞学视野下的中美庭审语言研究"(XQ1141)
