期刊文献+

考虑合著者的h指数的修正-国际研究回顾 被引量:7

原文传递
导出
摘要 随着h指数广泛应用于科研工作者的评价,它没有考虑合著者的缺陷也暴露出来,这影响了h指数作为评价指标的公正性。本文介绍了几种常用的考虑合著者的h指数的修正方法,并分析了各个方法的优缺点。
作者 刘烜贞
出处 《中国科技期刊研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期987-991,共5页 Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual' s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of theUnited States of America, 2005, 102(46) : 16569 - 16572.
  • 2王梅英,刘雪立.h-指数及其扩展指标的研究进展[J].中国科技期刊研究,2011,22(2):184-189. 被引量:27
  • 3Sekerciog|u CH. Quantifying coauthor contributions. Science, 2008, 322 (5900) :371.
  • 4Greene M. The demise of the lone author. Nature, 2007, 450 (7173) :1165 -1165.
  • 5Blaise C. Hyperauthorship: A Postmodern Perversion or Evidence of a Structural Shift in Scholarly Communication Practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2001, 48 ( 10 ) : 52 (7) :558 -569.
  • 6Kretschmer H, Rousseau R. Author inflation leads to a breakdown of Lotka' s law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001, 52(5) : 610 -614.
  • 7Cole JR, Cole S. Social stratification in science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973.
  • 8Price D J. de Solla. Multiple Authorship. Science, 1981,212 (4498) :986.
  • 9Hodge SE, Greenberg DA. Publication credit. Science, 1981, 213 (4511) : 950.
  • 10Sekercioglu CH. Quantifying coauthor contributions. Science,2008, 322(5900) :371.

二级参考文献39

  • 1金碧辉.科学家为自己设计了一项评价指标:h指数[J].科学观察,2006,1(1):8-9. 被引量:71
  • 2Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual' s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005,102(46 ) : 16569 - 16572.
  • 3Egghe L. An improvement of the h-index : g-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2006,2(1) :8 -9.
  • 4Molinari JF, Molinari A. A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. Scientometrics, 2008, 75( 1 ) : 163 - 174.
  • 5Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. hg-index : a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h-and g-indices. Scientometrics, 2010,82 ( 2 ) : 391 - 400.
  • 6Prathap G. Is there a place for a mock h-index. Scientometrics, 2009,84(1 ) :153 - 165.
  • 7Zhang CT. The e-index, complementing the h-Index for exces scitations. PLoS ONE, 2009,4(5) :e5429.
  • 8Barendse W. The strike rate index : a new index for journal quality based on journals size and the h-index of citations. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 2007, g : 3.
  • 9Glanzel W. On the opportunities and limitations of the h index, Science Focus, 2006, 1 ( 1 ) : 10 - 11.
  • 10Rousseau R. The influence of missing publications on the Hirsch index. Journal oflnformetrics, 2007, 1:2 -7.

共引文献26

同被引文献76

引证文献7

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部