期刊文献+

心脏再同步化治疗心力衰竭疗效预测因素研究 被引量:3

Predictive factors of response in heart failure by cardiac resynchronisation therapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨心力衰竭患者行心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)之前基础资料和术后短期心功能改善程度对长期疗效的预测价值。方法:对50例心力衰竭患者行CRT治疗,以治疗后6个月左室收缩末期容积(LVESV)较术前减小≥15%为治疗有效,分为有效组(32例)和无效组(18例)。对所有患者术前、术后1周及术后6个月行超声心动、QRS时限、脑钠肽(BNP)、心功能分级(NYHA)等检测。结果:50例患者均成功接受CRT。2组术前病因比例、左束支传导阻滞比例、NYHA、左房前后径、肺动脉压、QRS时限、室间机械延迟、左室间隔与后壁运动延迟、BNP等均差异有统计学意义。2组术前与术后1周各指标差值(△)中,△LVESV、△左室射血分数、△QRS时限等差异有统计学意义。多元回归分析显示,△LVESV是预测CRT有效性的保护因素。ROC曲线显示,△LVESV对CRT疗效有预测价值(曲线下面积=0.88,P<0.01),当△LVESV≥11.0 ml时,敏感度和特异度最大,分别为84%和83%;△QRS对CRT疗效也有一定的预测价值(曲线下面积=0.74,P<0.01),当△QRS≥20.0ms时,敏感度和特异度最大,分别为88%和56%。有效组和无效组5年生存率分别为80.0%和61.1%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.036)。结论:术前病情严重程度、心脏机械运动不同步程度及△LVESV、△QRS大小对CRT疗效有一定的预测价值。 Objective:To explore the predictive factors of response in heart failure by cardiac resynchronisation therapy(CRT).Method:Fifty patients with heart failure received RCT.At least 15% reduction in LVESV at the 6 months after CRT was defined as responders.They were divided into effective group(n=32) and ineffective group(n=18) group.All patients′ electrocardiogram,the duration of QRS wave,BNP and NYHA were examined at baseline,one week and six months after CRT.Result:Pacemakers were successfully implanted in all the 50 patients.The percentage of ischemic cardiomyopathy and CLBBB,NYHA,LAD,PAP,the duration of QRS wave,IVMD,SPWMD and BNP before CRT were significantly different between the two groups.The changes(△) of LVESV,LVEF and QRS before CRT and one week after CRT were significantly different between the two groups.Multivariable Logistic regression analysis showed that △LVESV was an independent positive predictor of response to CRT.ROC curve showed that △LVESV could predict the response to CRT(AUC=0.88,P0.01).Decrease of 11.0 ml in LVESV could predict response to CRT with a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 83%.The level of △QRS wave also could predict the response to CRT(AUC=0.74,P0.01).Decrease of 20.0 ms in QRS could predict response to CRT with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 56%.The survival estimates at 5 years was significantly different between the two groups(P=0.036).Conclusion:The pathogenetic condition,the level of mechanical dyssynchrony,△LVESV and △QRS wave can predict the response in patients with heart failure treated by CRT.
出处 《临床心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期807-810,共4页 Journal of Clinical Cardiology
关键词 心力衰竭 心脏再同步化治疗 心脏超声 疗效 预测 heart failure cardiac resynchronization therapy echocardiography treatment outcome prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1SWEDBERG K, CLELAND J, DARGIE H, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure., executive summary (update 2005) [J] Eur Heart J,2005,26:1115-1140.
  • 2DICKSTEIN K, VARDAS P E, AURICCHIO A, et al. 2010 Focused Update of ESC Guidelines on device thera-py in heart failure[J]. Europace, 2010,12 : 1526 - 1536.
  • 3YU C M, ABRAHAM W T, BAX J, et al. Predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (PROSPECT)-study design[J]. Am Heart J, 2005, 149:600-605.
  • 42HUNG E S, LEON A R, TAVAZZI L, et al. Re- sults of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROS- PECT) tria[J]. Circulation,2008,117:2608-2616.
  • 5CLELAND J, FREEMANTLE N, GHIO S, et al. Predicting the long-term effects of cardiac resynchro- nization therapy on mortality from baseline variables and the early response a report from the CARE-HF (Cardiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure) Trial [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2008,52:438-445.
  • 6徐茂椿,邱建平,张瑜,朱华,刘淼,孙敏敏.扩张型心肌病患者心脏再同步化治疗的疗效观察[J].临床心血管病杂志,2010,26(2):100-103. 被引量:14
  • 7KIRUBAKARAN S, LADWINIEC A, ARUJUNA A, et al. Male gender and chronic obstructive pulmo- nary disease predict a poor clinical response in pa- tients undergoing cardiac resynchronisation therapy [J]. Int J Clin Pract,2011,65:281-288.
  • 8VAN BOMMEL R J, BAX J J, ABRAHAM W T, et al. Characteristics of heart failure patients associated with good and poor response to cardiac resynchronization ther- apy: a PROSPECT (Predictors of Response to CRT) sub-analysis[J]. Eur Heart J,2009,30 : 2470- 2477.
  • 9ADELSTEIN E C, SABA S. Scar burden by myocardial perfusion imaging predicts echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischemic cardiomyop- athy[J]. Am Heart J, 2007,15a : 105-112.
  • 10MARSAN N A, BLEEKER G B , VAN BOMMEL R J, et al. Comparison of time course of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with is- chemic versus non-ischemie cardiomyopathy[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2009,103 : 690- 694.

二级参考文献16

  • 1LINDE C, LECLERCQ C, REX S, et al. Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure:results from the Multisite Stimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study[J]. J Am Coll Cardioi,2002,40:111--118.
  • 2ABRAHAM W T, FISHER W G, SMITH A L, et al. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure [J]. N EnglJ Med, 2002 , 346:1845--1853.
  • 3BRISTOW M R, FELDMAN A M, SAXON L A. Heart failure management using implantable devices for ventricular resynchronization: Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Chronic Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial[J]. J Card Fail, 2000 ,6:276--285.
  • 4BIMIE D H, TANG A S. The problem of no-response to cardiac resynchroniaation therapy [J]. Curr Opin Cardiol,2006,21 : 20--26.
  • 5YU C M, WING-HONG FUNG J, ZHANG Q, et al. Understanding nonsponders of cardiac resynchronization therapy current and future perspectives [J].J Cardiovase Electrophysiol, 2005,16 : 1117 -- 1124.
  • 6YU C M, FUNG J W, ZHANG Q, et al. Tissue Doppler imaging is superior to strain rate imaging and postsystolic shortening on the prediction of reverse remodeling in both isehemic and nonischemic heart fail ure after cardiac resynchronization therapy[J].Circulation, 2004,110 : 66 -- 73.
  • 7YU C M, CHAU E, SANDERSON J, et al. Tissue Doppler echocardiographic evidence of reverse remodeling and improved synchronicity by simultaneously delaying regional contraction after biventricular pacing therapy in heart failure[J]. Circulation, 2002, 29:438 --445.
  • 8GOLD M R, AURICCHIO A, HUMMEL J D, et al. Comparison of stimulation sites within left ventricular veins on the acute hemodynamie effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy [J]. Heart Rhythm, 2005,2 : 376--381.
  • 9SAWHNEY N S, WAGGONER A D, GARHWAL S, et al. Randomized prospective trial of atrioventricular delay programming for cardiac resynchronization therapy[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2004,1 : 562-- 567.
  • 10YU C M, ZHANG Q, FUNG J W, et al. A novel tool to assess systolic asynchrony and identify responders of cardiac resynchronization therapy by tis sue synchronization imaging [J].J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005,45:677--684.

共引文献13

同被引文献30

  • 1Van Bommel ILl, Bax JJ, Abraham WT, et al. Charac- teristics of heart failure patients associated with good and poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a PROSPECT (Predictors of Response to CRT) sub-a- nalysis[J]. Eur Heart J,2009,30(20):2 470-2 477.
  • 2Zareba W, Klein H,Cygankiewicz I, et al. Effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy by QRS morpholo- gy in the muhicenter automatic defibrillator implanta- tion trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT- CRT) clinical perspective [J].Circulation, 2011, 123 (10):1 061-1 072.
  • 3Hsing JM, Selzman KA, Leclercq C, et al. Paced left ventricular QRS width and ECG parameters predict outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy clini- cal perspective PROSPECT-ECG substudy[J]. Circula-tion: Arrhythmia and Eleetrophysiology, 2011, 4 (6) : 851-857.
  • 4Sipahi I,Chou JC, Hyden M,et al. Effect of QRS mor- phology on clinical event reduction with cardiac resyn- chronization therapy: Meta-analysis of randomized con- trolled trials[J]. Am Heart J, 2012,163 : 260-267, e3.
  • 5Auricchio A,Fantoni C, Regoli F, et al. Characterization of left ventricular activation in patients with heart fail- ure and left bundle-branch block[J].Circulation, 2004, 109(9):1 133-1 139.
  • 6Mascioli G, Padeletti L, Sassone B, et al. Electrocardio- graphic criteria of true left bundle branch block:a sim- ple sign to predict a better clinical and instrumental re- sponse to CRT[J]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2012,35 (8) :927-934.
  • 7Strauss DG, Selvester RH, Wagner GS. Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchroniza- tion therapy[J]. Am J Cardiol,2011,107(6) :927-934.
  • 8Padanilam BJ, Morris KE, Olson JA, et al. The surface electrocardiogram catheterization in patients with pre- existing left bundle branch block:implications for the definition of complete left bundle branch block [J]. J Cardiovasc Eleetrophysiol,2010,21(7) :781-785.
  • 9Tian Y,Zhang P, Li X, et al. True complete left bundle branch block morphology strongly predicts good re- sponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy [J]. Eu- ropace,2013,15(10) :1 499-1 506.
  • 10Barold S, Herweg B. Usefulness of the 12-lead electro- cardiogram in the follow-up of patients with cardiac re- synchronization devices[J]. PartI Cardiology Journal, 2011,18 : 476-486.

引证文献3

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部