摘要
在我国,长期以来疏于对庭前准备程序的研究与制度构建,在实践中引发了一系列问题。此次修法构建了具有我国特色的刑事庭前会议制度,标志着我国刑事诉讼程序步入了精细化、科学化的发展轨迹。庭前会议承载着公正与效率两大价值,发挥着资讯、确保庭审实质化、程序分流以及防止庭前预断等基本的制度功能。但从司法适用的角度来讲,有必要对庭前会议启动方式、主持者、处理问题的范围、处理问题的方式与效力以及庭前会议的程序问题做进一步的明确。庭前会议,从本质上来讲属于庭前准备程序。因此,对庭前会议的理解与适用在不违背立法原意的基础上,应当遵循这一基本的制度定位。
The long-standing negligence to the study and construction of the pretrial preparation procedure in our country has led to a series of problems in practice.The amending of the law built the criminal pretrial conference system with Chinese characteristics,marked China's criminal procedure entered a meticulous,scientific development trajectory.The pretrial conference carries two values of fairness and efficiency and plays the basic system functions of information,ensuring the substantialization of trial,procedure division and preventing pretrial judgment.From the view of judicial application,it is necessary to define the start-up mode,the presiding officer,the scope of the handling problems,the ways and effectiveness of tackling problems,and the procedure of pretrial conference.The pretrial conference belongs to the pretrial preparation procedure in essence.Therefore,the understanding and application of the pretrial conference should follow the basic institutional position on the basis of not going against the legislative intent.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第11期31-43,共13页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词
庭前程序
庭前准备程序
庭前会议
Pretrial Procedure,Pretrial Preparation Procedure,Pretrial Conference
