期刊文献+

比较经皮椎体成形术与保守治疗对慢性疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者疗效的非随机前瞻性试验 被引量:27

Comparison of percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative measures for chronic painful osteoporotic spinal fractures: a nonrandomized prospective trial
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较经皮椎体成形术(PVP)和保守治疗对慢性疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者在疼痛缓解和功能恢复方面的疗效。方法 81例患者分成两组,分别施行PVP(n=41,A组)或保守治疗(n=40,B组)。患者均经MRI证实患有慢性压缩性骨折,且疼痛持续在3个月或以上。观察两组患者在治疗后1周,1、3、6个月和1年的疼痛缓解和功能恢复情况。结果共有71例(A组37例和B组34例)完成了1年随访评估。通过在1周,1、3、6个月和1年的视觉模拟评(VAS)评分、功能障碍指数评分、欧洲基金会关于骨质疏松症的生活品质问卷评分和罗兰莫里斯残疾评分显示,A组在疼痛缓解和功能恢复方面显著优于B组,各时间点两组差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.01)。最终的临床随访评估中A组有30例、B组13例患者疼痛达到完全缓解(P<0.01)。结论 PVP在治疗慢性压缩性骨折和持续性疼痛的缓解及功能恢复方面优于保守治疗。 Objective To compared the therapeutic efficacy (relieving pain and restoring function) of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) with that of conservative measures (CM) for chronic painful osteoporotic spinal fractures. Methods A total of 81 patients with MRI- proved chronic compression fractures and persistent severe pain lasting for 3 months or more were enrolled in this study. Based on the treatment received, the patients were divided into PVP group (n = 41) and CM group (n = 40). The degrees of pain relief and function recovery at one week, one, 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment were evaluated. The results were compared between the two groups. Results One-year follow-up evaluation was accomplished in 37 patients of PVP group and in 34 patients of CM group. The degrees of pain rehef and function recovery of PVP group were significantly better than those of CM group. The differences in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, in Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, in Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) and in Roland Morris Disability (RMD) determined at one week, one, 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment between the two groups were statistically significant (P 〈 0.001 ) for all the above listed items). The final clinical follow-up evaluation showed that complete pain-free was obtained in 30 patients of PVP group and in 13 patients of CM group (P 〈 0.001). Conclusion For the treatment of chronic compression fractures with persistent severe pain, percutaneous vertebroplasty is superior to conservative measures in relieving pain and restoring function.
出处 《介入放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期921-926,共6页 Journal of Interventional Radiology
关键词 骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折 疼痛 经皮椎体成形术 保守治疗 osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture pain percutaneousvertebroplasty conservative treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1邓钢,何仕诚,滕皋军,方文,郭金和,朱光宇,李国昭,丁惠娟,沈志萍.经皮椎体成形术治疗脊椎恶性肿瘤[J].介入放射学杂志,2005,14(3):261-265. 被引量:69
  • 2李永亮,颜志平.脊柱转移瘤的双介入治疗[J].介入放射学杂志,2006,15(7):434-436. 被引量:7
  • 3杨祚璋,许建波,桑成林,孙洪瀑,刘鹏杰,袁涛,钱保生,张晋煜,李文忠,李建林,肖砚斌,彭敏,李浴,栾丽.数字减影血管造影机引导下经皮椎体成形术治疗脊柱肿瘤的临床研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2006,20(10):999-1003. 被引量:10
  • 4Afzal S,Dhar S,Vasavada NB,et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic fractures[J].Pain Physician,2007,10:559-563.
  • 5Diamond TH,Champion B,Clark WA.Management of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures:a nonrandomized trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy[J].Am J Med,2003,114:257-265.
  • 6Mehbod A,Aunoble S,Le Huec JC.Vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spine fracture-prevention and treatment[J].Eur Spine J,2003,12(8uppl 2):S155-S162.
  • 7BarrJD,Barr MS,Lemley TJ,et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization[J].Spine,2000,25:923-928.
  • 8Brown DB,Gilula LA,Sehgal M,et al.Treatment of chronic symptomatic vertebral compression fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty[J].AJR,2004,182:319-322.
  • 9Huntoon EA,Schmidt CK,Sinaki M.Significantly fewer refractures after vertebroplasty in patients who engage in back-extensor-strengthening exercises[J].Mayo Clin Proc,2008,83:54-57.
  • 10Do HM.Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of patients for percutaneous vertebroplasty[J].Top Magn Reson Imaging,2000,11:235-244.

共引文献86

同被引文献328

引证文献27

二级引证文献226

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部