期刊文献+

《弗莱克斯纳报告》与美国医学教育认证的起源 被引量:13

The Flexner Report and the Origin of Medical Education Accreditation in the United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《弗莱克斯纳报告》不仅对美国的医学教育产生了深刻影响,而且开启了美国现代医学教育认证的新时代。《弗莱克斯纳报告》倡导医学教育认证缘起于美国当时高等教育数量与质量的矛盾、政治文化理念、医学教育高度自治和分权制管理的传统以及政府和公民社会的共同诉求。该报告的出现明确了医学院的入学标准、学制、州医学考试委员会的地位,为后来的医学教育认证提供了依据。在《弗莱克斯纳报告》的影响下,美国医学教育认证制度也从步履维艰的萌芽阶段逐步确立下来。 The Flexner Report not only exerted a profound influence on medical education in the United States, but opened a new era of medical education accreditation. It maintains that medical education accreditation originates from the contradiction between the quantity and quality of higher education in the United States at that period, political and culture concepts, the tradition of high degree of autonomy in medical education and decentralized management as well as the common pursuit of federal government and civil society. The report clarifies the standards for medical school admission, length of schooling and the status of State Board of Medical Examiners, providing a basis for medical education accreditation. Under the influence of the report, the medical education accreditation system gradually established from the embryonic stage in the United States.
出处 《复旦教育论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期93-96,共4页 Fudan Education Forum
基金 国家自然科学基金项目<高等教育认证制度的社会选择和效率理论研究>(项目批准号:70973036)
关键词 弗莱克斯纳报告 医学教育认证 起源 The Flexner Report Medical Education Accreditation Origin
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Flexner A. Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; Bulletin No.4 [R]. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1910.
  • 2Harclerroad F F.The Hidden Hand: External Constituendes and Their Impact[G]//Altbach P G, Berdahl R O, Gumport P J. Amrican Higher Education in the Twenty-first Century: Social,Political, and Challenges, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins university Press, 1999: 252.
  • 3Bordley J. TWO Centuries of American Medicine,1776-1976 [G]. Philadelphia: W.B. Sanun ders Company, 1976: 161-165.
  • 4莱斯特·M·萨拉蒙 著 贾西津 译.全球公民社会-非营利部门视界[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002..
  • 5张艳荣.20世纪初美国高等医学教育改革历程回顾与分析[J].中华医史杂志,2002,32(1):5-9. 被引量:18
  • 6Beck A. The Flexner report and the standardization of American medical ducation[J]. JAMA, 2004:2139-2140.
  • 7A Chronology of Aeereditation, Events Leading to the Council for Higher Education Aeereditation [EB/OL].[2012-08-11]. http://ww. ehea.org/Commentary/history.htm.
  • 8Harcleroad F F. Accreditation: Voluntary Enterprise in Understanding Accreditation [M].San Francisca: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1983: 42.
  • 9熊耕.美国高等教育认证制度的起源及其形成动力分析[J].外国教育研究,2004,31(6):61-64. 被引量:19
  • 10Bogue E G, Saunders R L. The Evidence For Quality [M].San Francsiac: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1992: 36.

二级参考文献15

  • 1范文曜,张伟.英国高等教育的评估和大学拨款[J].理工高教研究,2003,22(6):4-12. 被引量:28
  • 2康宏.我国高等教育评估制度:回顾与展望[J].高教探索,2006(4):20-22. 被引量:29
  • 3约翰.杜菲 张大庆等(译).从体液论到医学科学:美国医学的演进历程[M].青岛:青岛出版社,2000.157.
  • 4贺国庆.近代欧洲对美国医学教育的影响[M].保定:河北大学出版社,2000.116.
  • 5徐惟诚.不列颠百科全书(卷6)[M].北京:中国百科全书出版社,1999.339.
  • 6卡尔L.怀特 张孔来等(译).弥合裂痕:流行病学、医学和公众的卫生[M].北京:科学出版社,1995.108-173.
  • 7Young,K. E.,Chamber, H.R.. and Kells,H.R. Understanding Accreditation [ M] . San Francisca:Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1983. 6.
  • 8Harcleroad, F. F. Accreditation:Voluntary Enterprise in Understanding Accreditation [M]. San Francisca:Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1983. 42.
  • 9Bogue,E.Grandy and Saunders,Robert L. The Evidence For Quality[M] . San Francisca:Jossey-Bass Publishers,1992. 36.
  • 10Mitzel,Harold E. Encyclopedia of Educational Research(5th edn.)[M]. New York:The Frees Press, 1982. 9.

共引文献49

同被引文献96

引证文献13

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部