期刊文献+

我国宪法权威缺失的原因 被引量:1

Analyzing the Reasons of the Absence of Constitution Authority in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 宪法最高权威性不仅体现在形式上,更重要的应体现在实质上。然而我国的宪法权威却是缺失的。缺乏市场经济的支撑,宪法权威失去了经济基础的保障;政党制度可操作性的空白与发达民主政治的缺乏,使宪法权威失去了政治层面的维护;思想上宪法意识和宪法信仰的薄弱,无力支撑宪法权威;在法律层面上,违宪审查制、司法实践中的回避更进一步将宪法权威与人们生活之间的距离拉远,缺失也就成为情理之中的事情。 As the core of a country's legal system, the constitution, which is a country's fundamental law, should have the supreme authority that lies not only in form, but also in essence. However, studying of Chinese present constitution, we can get the conclusion that the constitution lacks of authority. Analyzing the reasons of the absence of constitution authority in China, we can get the answers from the economy, ideology, system and the judicial practice. The constitution is the product of the market economy. Without the support of the developed market economy, the constitution authority lacks of the ensurance of its economic foundation. Without the support of the developed democratic politics and the political party system the constitution authority lacks of the ensurance of its political foundation. However, the establishment of the constitution authority finally lies in people's constitutional awareness and belief. The weakness of the constitutional awareness and belief can not support the constitution authority. The absence of anti-constitution review provides room for the anti-constitution behavior. What's more, the abstention in the judicial practice widens the distance between the constitution authority and the people's life. All these factors destroy the constitution authority. The lack of the constitution authority is reasonable.
作者 王峰
出处 《天水行政学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2012年第5期62-67,共6页 Journal of Tianshui College of Administration
基金 国家社科基金项目<预算宪法问题研究>(课题编号:12BFX030) 教育部课题<权力机关预算审批监督问题研究:以程序为中心>(项目编号:10YJC820159)的阶段性成果
关键词 宪法权威 民主政治 法律回避 the authority of the constitution democratic politics the absence of the law
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1李龙,周叶中.宪法学基本范畴简论[J].中国法学,1996(6):63-71. 被引量:98
  • 2陈端洪.宪政初论[J].比较法研究,1992,6(4):1-10. 被引量:42
  • 3李莉.“村务交接”案引出的两点思考[J].政治与法律,2002(1):102-105. 被引量:6
  • 4.马克思恩格斯全集(23)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972..
  • 5[美]伯尔曼 梁治平.法律与宗教[M].北京:三联书店出 版社,1991.15.
  • 6.列宁选集(3)[M].人民出版社,1972..
  • 7[法]卢梭.社会契约论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1962.
  • 8邓小平文选(二)[M].北京:人民出版社,1994.322.
  • 9同上,第154页.
  • 10[美]爱德华·考文.美国宪法的“高级法”背景[M].上海.三联书店,1996.

共引文献17

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部