期刊文献+

不同Wagner分级糖尿病足患者自我管理行为现况评分比较 被引量:3

Comparing Self-management Behavior Status Score of Different Wagner Classification Diabetes Foot Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较不同Wagner分级糖尿病足(Diabetic Foot,DF)患者自我管理行为现况评分。方法:连续选择近期来诊及住院治疗的DF患者83例,他们分别接受了DF足溃疡Wagner分级(严重度)和"糖尿病自我管理行为量表(DSCS)"评估。结果:83例DF患者中,Wagner分级0级28例(33.73%)、l级21例(25.30%)、2级15例(18.07%)、3级16例(19.28%)和4级3例(3.6%)。高级别DF(3~4级)患者DSCS各维度分及自我管理行为总分均明显少于低级别(1~2级)和0级别DF患者(P均<0.05~0.01)。结论:高级别的Wagner分级DF患者自我管理行为现况评分较差。 Objective:To contrast the current situation Score of self-management actions between different Wagner grading of the diabetic foot(DF) patients.Methods:Data of 83 DF cases in The PLA DiErLingEr hospital during recent to see a doctor and have a hospitalization by continuous selection.They accept the DF foot ulcer Wagner classification and "diabetes self-management actions scale(DSCS)" evaluation,respectively.Results:Among 83 DF patients,Wagner grading class 0 in 28 patients(33.73%),grade 1 in 21 cases(25.30%),grade 2 in 15 cases(18.07%),grade 3 in 16 cases(19.28%),grade 4 in 3 cases(3.6%).Each of the dimension points and self-management behavior total score,the DSCS of DF patients in High-level(3-4) class,were obviously less than a low level(1-2 class) and 0 level DF patients(P 0.05 ~ 0.01).Conclusion:high-grade Wagner classification DF patients has a pool status score of self management behavior.
出处 《中国医药导刊》 2012年第10期1729-1730,共2页 Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词 糖尿病足 Wagner分级 自我管理行为 DSCS量表 Diabetes foot Wagner classification Self-management behavior DSCS scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献33

共引文献160

同被引文献48

  • 1莫一菲,周健,贾伟平.国际糖尿病联盟2012年全球2型糖尿病指南解读[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2012,4(11):70-77. 被引量:22
  • 2中国医师协会内分泌代谢科医师分会,中华医学会内分泌.中国胰岛素泵治疗指南(2010)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2011,3(4):78-86. 被引量:48
  • 3Sohn M W, Budiman-Mak E, Stuck R M, et al. Diag- nostic accuracy of existing methods for identifying diabetic foot ulcers from inpatient and outpatient datasets [ J]. J Foot Ankle Res, 2010,3:27.
  • 4Xu W, Weng J. Current role of short-term intensive insu-lin strategies in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes [ J]. J Diabetes, 2013,5 (3) :268-274.
  • 5廖二元.内分泌学:上册[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:124-125.
  • 6Zgonis T, Stapleton J J, Girard-Powell V A, et aL Surgi- cal management of diabetic foot infectionns and amputa- tions [ J ]. AORN J, 2008,87 ( 5 ) : 935-946.
  • 7Gohel M G, Chacko A N. Serum GGT activity and hsCRP level in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with good and poor glycemic control: An evidence linking oxi- dative stress, inflammation and glycemic control [ J ]. J Diabetes Metab Disord, 2013,12 ( 1 ) :56.
  • 8Zhang W, Zhao S, Li Y, et al. Acute blood glucose fluc- tuation induces myocardial apoptosis through oxidative stress and nuclear factor-KB activation [ J]. Cardiology, 2013,124(1) :11-17.
  • 9Zsuga J, Gesztelyi R, Kemeny-Beke A, et aL Different effect of hyperglycemia on stroke outcome in non -diabetic and diabetic patients -a cohort study [ J ]. Neurol Res, 2012,34( 1 ) :72-79.
  • 10Daudona P, Ghanim H, Bandyopadhyay A, et al. Insulin suppresses endotoxin-induced oxidative, nitrosative, and inflammatory stress in humans[ J]. Diabetes Care, 2010, 33 ( 11 ) :2416-2423.

引证文献3

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部