摘要
目的:比较超声乳化与小切口非超声乳化白内障手术的临床疗效。方法:选择我院收治的126例白内障患者,随机分为A组(n=63)和B组(n=63),A组患者行超声乳化白内障手术,B组患者行小切口非超声乳化白内障手术,比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果:对患者进行术后3个月的随访发现,术后1天A组52例(82.5%)患者视力>0.5,B组40例患者(63.5%)视力>0.5,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而术后7天、1个月及3个月视力恢复情况的组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组术后并发症发生率为27.0%(17/63),略低于B组的31.7%(20/63),组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:超声乳化和小切口非超声乳化白内障手术治疗均能取得较好的临床疗效,临床实际工作中要严格掌握手术适应症,根据具体情况选择适合的手术方式,手术操作中应仔细谨慎,减少并发症的发生率,保证手术的安全性。
Objective：To compare the results of phacoemulsification and small incision non-phacoemulsification cataract operation clinical curative effect.Methods：126 cases of cataract patients were randomly divided into group A and group B.A group of phacoemulsification cataract operation,B group of small incision non phacoemulsification cataract operation,comparison of the curative effect of two groups.Results：1 days after operation 52 cases in A group（82.5%） vision in patients 0.5,B group of 40 patients（63.5%） visual acuity 0.5,significant difference（P0.05）,and on postoperative days 7,1and 3 months sight the recovery of the difference was not significant（P0.05）.A group the postoperative complication rate was 27%（17 /63）,slightly lower than B group 31.7%（20/63）,no significant difference between groups（P0.05）.Conclusion：Phacoemulsification and small incision non-phacoemulsification cataract operation treatment can achieve good clinical curative effect,according to the specific situation to choose suitable operation mode of operation,operation in reducing the incidence of complications,ensure the operation safety.
出处
《中国医药导刊》
2012年第11期1872-1872,1874,共2页
Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词
白内障
超声乳化
小切口非超声乳化
Ataract
Phacoemulsification
Small incision non phacoemulsification
