摘要
《史记·六国年表》载楚考烈王十年"徙于钜阳",元明以降学者信疑参半,近年研究者提出此前三十多年楚国外部环境相对安稳,没有必要迁都,因而否认之。此论不可取。据《韩非子》记载,楚国迁徙钜阳前魏国于陈城周边三败楚军,对楚都形成三面包抄态势,说明楚王不迁都无以自安,此与《六国年表》记载可以相互印证。还有,《战国策》记楚令尹春申君言"魏、齐新怨楚",以及春申君让出寿春封邑以建设新楚都等,可以进一步说明楚与魏、齐之矛盾,及匆忙迁徙后之考虑。《韩非子》、《战国策》为先秦旧籍,有关记载也可以和其它文献资料相对证,足以信人。再说《六国年表》所述有早期官方谱牒历记以为参照,较之纪传可信度要高,文字简短,传抄误写的可能性亦小,不可随意否定。钜阳的位置大略当今阜阳市以北颍、淝二水间,正当郢陈南下江淮的冲要地带。
'Records ·Six Countries Chronology'contains King of Chu’s resettlement in Juyang in his tenth year reign. Scholars since Yuan and Ming Dynasties are mixed with suspected belief. In recent years,researchers have proposed thirty years before that,the external environment is relatively stable in the state of Chu,there is no need to move the capital,thus this theory is not desirable. According to 'Han Feizi 'records,before migrating to Juyang,the State Wei had surrounded the city and defeated the army of Chu three times.'Han Feizi','The Warring States 'and some other evidences show that there had been much contradictions among the three states Qi,Chu and Wei. Besides,as'Six Countries Chronology'has the early official genealogical calendar notes as reference, the magazine credibility high,character brief,the possibility of error small,its credibility can not be denied. Juyang’s position is roughly today’s Fuyang north of the city of Ying,between the two waters of North Ying and Fei,just south of the river ’s important place.
出处
《学术界》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第11期108-117,284,共10页
Academics
关键词
《六国年表》
楚迁都
钜阳
寿春
Six Countries Chronology
Chu moved the capital
Kui Yang
Shouchun
