期刊文献+

锁定钢板治疗Neer三部分及四部分肱骨近端骨折疗效 被引量:11

EFFECTIVENESS OF LOCKING PLATES FOR Neer THREE- AND FOUR-PART PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨锁定钢板治疗Neer三部分及四部分肱骨近端骨折的疗效。方法回顾分析2008年7月-2011年5月,采用切开复位、锁定钢板内固定治疗并获12个月以上随访的77例Neer三部分及四部分肱骨近端骨折患者的临床资料。男39例,女38例;年龄18~81岁,平均54.2岁。致伤原因:跌伤47例,交通事故伤16例,高处坠落伤4例,运动伤5例,其他原因5例。受伤至手术时间2~16 d,平均4.5 d。骨折根据Neer分型标准:三部分骨折54例,四部分骨折23例。随访评估患者肩关节功能Constant评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及相关并发症。结果术后76例切口Ⅰ期愈合,1例Ⅱ期愈合。患者均获随访,随访时间12~36个月,平均18.5个月。末次随访时,Constant评分为(71.1±11.9)分;获优18例,良24例,中25例,差10例,优良率为54.5%。VAS评分为(2.8±2.2)分。2例患者发生骨不连;余患者骨折均愈合,愈合时间2~6个月,平均3.2个月。术后25例患者发生并发症,发生率为32.5%;15例行二次手术,二次手术率为19.5%。结论对于Neer三部分及四部分肱骨近端骨折应争取解剖复位、稳定固定、减少肱骨头血供破坏,以获得良好疗效。 Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of locking plates for Neer 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 77 patients with 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures, who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of locking plates and were followed up more than 12 months between luly 2008 and May 2011. There were 39 males and 38 females with an average age of 54.2 years (range, 18-81 years). Fractures were caused by falling in 47 cases, by traffic accident in 16 cases, by falling from height in 4 cases, by sporting in 5 cases, and by other reasons in 5 cases. The time between injury and operation was 2-16 days (mean, 4.5 days). According to Neer classification, there were 54 cases of 3-part fracture and 23 cases of 4-part fracture. The Constant scores, visual analogue score (VAS), and the complications were evaluated during follow-up. Results After operation, healing of incisions by first intention was obtained in 76 cases and healing by second intention in 1 case. All patients were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 18.5 months). At last follow-up, the Constant score was 71.1 _+ 11.9; the results were excellent in 18 cases, good in 24 cases, fair in 25 cases, and poor in 10 cases with an excellent and good rate of 54.5%. The VAS score was 2.8 + 2.2. Bone nonunion occurred in 2 cases; the other patients had bone union within 2-6 months (mean, 3.2 months). The complications occurred in 25 cases (32.5%). Revision surgery was performed in 15 patients (19.5%). humerus fractures remains challenging. Anatomic reduction, stable may lead to a satisfactory outcome. Conclusion The treatment of Neer 3- and 4-part proximal fixation, and reduced humeral head blood supply disruption
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期1469-1472,共4页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
基金 上海交通大学"医工(理)交叉基金"资助项目(YG2009MS31)~~
关键词 肱骨近端骨折 锁定钢板 内固定 Proximal humerus fracture Locking plate Internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury, 2006, 37(8): 691-697.
  • 2Sproul RC, Iyengar JJ, Devcic Z, et al. A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury, 2011, 42(4): 408- 413.
  • 3Gardner MI, Well Y, Barker JU, et aI. The importance of medial sup- port in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trau- ma, 2007, 21(3): 185-191.
  • 4Krappinger D, Bizzotto N, Riedmann S, et al. Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury, 2011, 42(11): 1283-1288.
  • 5Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, et al. Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures, 1 Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2009, 91(7): 1689-1697.
  • 6Russo R, Visconti V, Lombardi LV, et al. Da Vinci System: clinical experience with complex proximal humerus fractures. Musculoskelet Surg, 2010, 94 Suppl 1: S57-64.
  • 7朱乃锋,陈云丰.肱骨近端骨折内固定物稳定性的生物力学分析[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2010,24(12):1459-1462. 被引量:24
  • 8Tingart MJ, Lehtinen 1, Zurakowski D, et al. Proximal humeral frac- tures: regional differences in bone mineral density of the humeral head affect the fixation strength of cancellous screws. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2006, 15(5): 620-624.
  • 9Zhang L, Zheng J, Wang W, et al. The clinical benefit of medial sup- port screws in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures: a pro- spective randomized study. Int Orthop, 2011, 35 (11): 1655-1661.
  • 10Hettrich CM, Neviaser A, Beamer BS, et al. Locked plating of the prox- imal humerus using an endosteal implant. J Orthop Trauma, 2012, 26(4): 212-215.

二级参考文献55

  • 1文良元,薛庆云,黄公怡,纪权,王晓滨.老年肱骨近端骨折的内固定治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(11):641-644. 被引量:56
  • 2黄强,王满宜,荣国威.复杂肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(3):159-164. 被引量:198
  • 3Seide K, Triebe l, Faschingbauer M, et al. Locked vs. unlocked plate os- teosynthesis of the proximal humerus--A biomechanical study, Clinical Biomechanics, 2007, 22 (2): 176-182.
  • 4Walsh S, Reindl R, Harvey E, et al. Biomechanical comparison of a unique locking plate versus a standard plate for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in a cadaveric model. Clinical Biomechanics, 2006, 21(10): 1027-1031.
  • 5Chudik S, Weinhold P, Dahners E. Fixed-angle plate fixation in simulated fractures of the proximal humerus: a biomechanical study of a new device. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2003, 12(6): 578-588.
  • 6Lungershausen W, Bach O, Lorenz CO. Locking plate osteosynthesis for fractures of the proximal humerus. Zentra|bl Chir, 2003, 128(1): 28-33.
  • 7Hente R, Kampshoff J, Kinner B, et al. Treatment of displaced 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus with an angle-stabilizing fixtion plate. Unfallchirurg, 2004, 107(9): 769-782.
  • 8Handschin AE, Cardell M, Contaldo C, et al. Functional results of angular-stable plate fixation in displaced proximal humeral fractures. Injury, 2008, 39(3): 306-313.
  • 9Bhandari M, Matthys G, McKee MD. Four part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Orthop Trauma, 2004, 18(2): 126-127.
  • 10Siffri PC, Peindl RD, Coley ER, et al. Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri. J Orthop Trauma, 2006, 20(8 ): 547- 554.

共引文献85

同被引文献102

  • 1黄强,王满宜,荣国威.复杂肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(3):159-164. 被引量:198
  • 2刘璠,唐亮,王友华,曹毅,曹涌,祝勇,王洪,朱鸣镝,陈向东.肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗老年性肱骨近端三、四部分骨折的近期疗效[J].中华手外科杂志,2005,21(5):258-261. 被引量:41
  • 3杨胜武,李悦,王健,滕红林,朱雄白,叶澄宇.人工肱骨头置换术治疗高龄复杂肱骨近端骨折[J].中华手外科杂志,2006,22(6):339-341. 被引量:13
  • 4刘璠,陶然,主译.内固定支架-理念LCP、LISS的临床应用[M] .山东科学技术出版社2010:157-229.
  • 5Neviaser AS,Hettrich CM,Dines JS,et al. Rate of avascular necrosis following proxi- mal humerus fractures treated with a later- al locking plate and endostealimplant [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2011,131 (12): 1617-1622.
  • 6Sukamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P,et al. OpenReduction and Internal Fixation of Proxi- mal Humeral Fractures with Use of the Locking Proximal Humerus Plate. Results of a Prospecfive,Multicenter,Observational Study [J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2009,91 (6):1320-1328.
  • 7Foroohar A, Tosti R, Richmond JM, et al. Classification and treatment of proximal humerus fractures: inter-observer reliabili- ty and agreement across imaging modalities and experience [J].J Orthop Surg Res, 2011,12(6):38.
  • 8Gardner M J, Voos JE, Wanich T, et al. Vascular impli- cations of minimally invasive plating of proximal hume-rus fractures [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma, 2006,20 ( 9 ) : 602- 607.
  • 9Herter B, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, et al. predictors of humeral head ischemic after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus [ J ]. J Should Elbow Surg, 2004, 13(4) :427-433.
  • 10Gardner MJ,Boraiah S,Helfet DL. The anterolateral ac- romial approach for fractures of the proximal humerus [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma,2008,22 (2) : 132-137.

引证文献11

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部