虚拟团队的知识交互:认知与行为整合的关系研究被引量：2

Knowledge Interaction of Virtual Teams:Research on the Relationships Between Cognition and Behavioral Integration

导出

摘要虚拟团队在组织的知识应用与协作中日益发挥重要作用,因此有必要探究虚拟团队内部的交互记忆系统(TMS)。文章针对虚拟团队更难以形成和运行TMS的特征,尝试探讨虚拟团队TMS的各维度内涵与传统团队的区别,用团队行为整合替代协调,探索行为整合与认知成分的相互关系,提出一个更全面的TMS模型,以期为虚拟团队的研究与管理提供一定启示。 The virtual team plays an increasingly important role in knowledge application and collaboration of the organization. Therefore, it＇s necessary to explore the Transactive Memory System （TMS） within the virtual team. In accordance with the characteristics that the virtual team is more difficult to form and run the TMS, this article tries to explore the differences of TMS＇s dimensional connotations between virtual team and traditional team. The article uses the team＇ s behavioral integration to replace the coordination, explores the correlations between behavioral integration and cognitive component, and proposes a more comprehensive model of TMS in the hope of providing certain inspirations for the study and management of virtual teams.

作者黄昱方范芸

机构地区江南大学商学院

出处《情报理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第12期42-46,共5页 Information Studies:Theory & Application

基金教育部人文社会科学研究项目"科技型新创企业创业团队行为整合与创业绩效:基于社会网络分析视角的研究"(项目编号:10YJA630069) 江苏省研究生培养创新工程项目"社会网络联结对虚拟团队有效性影响研究"(项目编号:CXLX11_0510)的成果

关键词交互记忆系统虚拟团队知识管理 TMS virtual team knowledze manazement

分类号 F272 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献22

1O' LEARY M B, CUMMINGS J N. The spatial, temporal, and eonfigurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31 : 433-452.
2MAZNEVSKI M L, CHUDOBA K M. Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness [ J ]. Organiza- tion Science, 2000, 11 (5) : 473-492.
3KIRKMAN B L, ROSEN B, TESLUK P E, et al. The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: the moderating role of face-to-face interaction [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47: 175-192.
4CRAMTON C D. The mutual knowledge problem and its conse- quences for dispersed collaboration [ J]. Organization Science, 2001, 12 (3): 346-371.
5WEGNER D M. A computer network model of human transactive memory [J]. Social Cognition. 1995, 13 (3) : 319-339.
6FARAJ S, et al. Coordinating expertise in software development teams [J]. Management Science. 2000, 46: 1554-1568.
7NEWELL S, TANSLEY C, HUANG J. Social capital and knowledge integration in an ERP project team: the importance of bridging and bonding [ J]. British Journal of Management, 2004 (15): 43-57.
8KANAWATTANACHAI P, YO0 Y. The impact of knowledge eoordination on virtual team performance over time [ J ]. MISQuarterly, 2007, 31: 783-808.
9STAPLES D S, WEBSTER J. Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams [J]. Information Systems Journal, 2008, 18: 617-640.
10LIN T, HSU J S, et al, Understanding the role of behavioural integration in ISD teams: an extension of transactive memory systems concept [ J]. Information Systems Journal, 2012, 22 (3) : 211-234.

二级参考文献31

1张志学,Paul S.Hempel,韩玉兰,邱静.高技术工作团队的交互记忆系统及其效果[J].心理学报,2006,38(2):271-280. 被引量：67
2Orlikowski W. J.. Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing. Organization Science, 2002, 13(3): 249-273.
3Oshri I., Fenema P., Kotlarisky J.. Knowledge Transfer in Glob- ally Distributed Teams: The Role of Transactive Memory. In- formation System Journal, 2008, 18: 593-616.
4Teasley S. D., Covi L. A., Krishnan M. S., Olson J. S.. Rapid Software Development through Team Collocation. IEEE Trans- actions on Software Engineering, 2002, 28(7): 671-683.
5Wegner D. M.. A Computer Network Model of Human Trans- active Memory. Social Cognition, 1995, 13: 319-339.
6Hollingshead A.B.. Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1998, 34(5): 423-442.
7Brandon D. P., Hollings4.head A. B.. Transactive Memory Sys- tems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People. Organization Science, 2004, 15(6): 633-64.
8Jackson P., Klobas J.. Transactive Memory Systems in Organi- zations: Implications for Knowledge Directories. Decision Sup- port Systems, 2008, 44: 409-424.
9Nevo D., Wand Y.. Organizational Memory Information Sys- tems: A Transactive Memory Approach. Decision Support Sys- tems, 2005, 39: 549-562.
10Lewis K.. Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems. Management Science, 2004, 50(11): 1519-1533.