摘要
殷墟甲骨文记事刻辞中的"■"字前人未曾论述,本文结合新出花东甲骨材料对甲骨文中的■、■、■字用法作了一番考察,认为它们实为一字异体,应释为"肇"之初文,含义上有"致送"一类意思;并强调了金文中"肇"字所从的"■"并非是"启"字,"启"在殷商甲骨文及西周金文中都是从"又"的,讹变成从"支"应是西周以后的事。
Key words： The character on the oracle bone inscriptions at Yin ruins was not researched before. This article researches the use of characters , according to the oracle bone inscriptions of eastern hua- yuanzhuang, and considers its are the same character and have variant forms, they should be the primeval form of Zhao （肇） whose means sending. The article emphasizes that the form Qi （） of Zhao （肇） in bronze inscription is different from the Qi （啟）, for the Qi （啟） always has the form of ＂You （又）＂ in or- acle bone inscriptions of Yin Ruins and bronze inscriptions in the Western Zhou Dynasty, but the You （又） is wrongly replaced by the Pu （攴） after the Western Zhou Dynasty
出处
《中原文物》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第6期52-59,共8页
Cultural Relics of Central China
