期刊文献+

腰硬联合麻醉与硬膜外阻滞麻醉在急诊剖宫产术中的应用效果比较 被引量:1

Effect Comparison of Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia and Epidural Block Anesthesia in Application of Emergency Cesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨硬膜外阻滞麻醉(EA)与腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)在急诊剖宫产术中的安全性及治疗效果。方法选取我院2011年2月至2012年6月急诊收治的剖宫产患者80例,按随机性原则分为CSEA组40例和EA组40例,比较两组患者的不良反应发生情况及新生儿Apgar评分、下肢运动阻滞效果、胎儿娩出时间、手术时间、麻醉起效时间。结果 CSEA组胎儿娩出时间、手术时间、麻醉起效时间明显优于EA组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组患者不良反应发生情况差异不显著,无统计学意义。结论 CSEA应用于急诊剖宫产术中具有阻滞完善、用药少、起效快,对呼吸、循环系统的影响较EA少,术后可连接镇痛泵等优点,值得临床进一步推广应用。 Objective To discuss the safety and treatment effect of epidural block anesthesia(EA) and combined spinal and epidural anesthesia(CSEA) in application of emergency cesarean section.Method 80 cases of emergency cesarean section patients in our hospital from 2011.2 to 2012.6 were chosen and divided randomly into CSEA group and EA group both with 40 cases.Patients of the two groups were compared in occurrence of adverse reactions,newborn babies’ Apgar scores,lower limb movement block effect,time of delivery,time of operation and onset time of anesthesia.Result The time of delivery and operation and the onset time of anesthesia of CSEA group was obviously better than CA group and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05);There was no significant difference between the two groups in occurrence of adverse reaction.Conclusion The application of CSEA in emergency cesarean section has the advantage of complete block,fewer drugs,quicker onset and fewer effects on respiratory and circulatory systems than EA and it can connect to analgesia pump after operation.It’s worthy of further promotion in clinical work.
作者 张运琼
出处 《中国医药指南》 2012年第33期19-20,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 腰硬联合麻醉 硬膜外麻醉 急诊剖宫产 CSEA EA Emergency Cesarean Section
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献22

  • 1陈月英,柏学民.5571例剖宫产原因分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2004,19(1):95-95. 被引量:31
  • 2蒋小亚,陈晓云.10年剖宫产率及指征分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2004,19(2):54-55. 被引量:109
  • 3陈新忠.剖宫产麻醉的若干问题[J].现代实用医学,2005,17(11):665-667. 被引量:13
  • 4张野.复合腰麻硬膜外麻醉[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1996,17(4):210-212. 被引量:271
  • 5谢荣 刘亚军.我国临床应用硬膜外阻滞的调查报告[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1991,11(4):240-240.
  • 6Brown DL, Carpenter RL, Thompson GE. Comparison of 0. 5% Ropivacaine and0. 5% Bupivacaine for epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing lower-extremity surgery[J]. Anesthesiology, 1992,72:633-636.
  • 7Lyons G, macdonald R, Mikl B. Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia for cesarean Section[J]. Anaesthesia, 1992,47:199-201.
  • 8Westbrook JL,Carrie LES. Combined spinal/epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section[J]. Anaesthesia, 1993, 48: 172.
  • 9Carrie LE, Donald F. A 26-gauge penNI-point needle for combined epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section[J]. Anaesthesia, 1991,46: 230-231.
  • 10曾因明,应诗达,杭燕南主编.麻醉科手册[M].第1版,上海:上海科学技术出版社,2000:575-576.

共引文献65

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部