摘要
《文选》所录者多为已有定评之精品,而对这些前代精品的接受并非限于"昭明太子及其身边"的刘孝绰、谢举、张率、王锡、张缅、王规、到洽、张瓒、王筠,故局限于这一范围的考察,对确定《文选》的实际编撰者所"提供新的视角和证据"没有太多的实际意义。况且,选不选某作品与写作时是否接受其影响,两者并非完全一回事。迄今为止,否定"萧统个人独力编纂《文选》"的种种理由,均难以成立。
Most works recorded in the Wen Xuan are appraised as excellent.If we limited the range of investigation of previous generation works only on Prince Zhao Ming and people like Liu Xiaochuo,Xie Ju,Zhang Shuai,Wang Xi,Zhang Mian, Wang Gui,Dao Qia,Zhang Zan and Wang Yun,it is not of much practical significance to determine the real editor of Wen Xuan by the new perspectives and evidence.Moreover,the selection of a works and the acceptance of its impact or not at the time of writing are not entirely the same thing.So far,it is difficult to find the reasons to deny Xiao Tong as the sole editor of Wen Xuan.
出处
《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2012年第5期91-97,共7页
Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社科基金西部项目"<文选>成书考说"(10XZW010)
关键词
文选
编者
萧统
东宫学士
刘孝绰
江淹
诗品
Wen Xuan
editor
Xiao Tong
Orient House scholar
Liu Xiaochuo
Jiang Yan
Shipin
